मराठी

Environmental Factors> Indian Studies on Environment and Intelligence

Advertisements

Topics

  • Introduction
  • Major Indian Studies on Environment and Intelligence
  • Study by Das, Jachuck, and Panda (1968)
  • Study by Rath, Dash & Dash, 1973
  • Study by Das & Singha, 1974
  • Study by Jachuck & Mohanty, 1974
  • Real-Life Application
  • Key Points: Indian Studies on Environment and Intelligence
CISCE: Class 12

Introduction

While genetics provides our intellectual blueprint, environment plays a crucial role in shaping intelligence. Indian researchers have studied how economic resources, social background, and living environment affect children’s cognitive growth.

CISCE: Class 12

Major Indian Studies on Environment and Intelligence

CISCE: Class 12

Study by Das, Jachuck, and Panda (1968)

Compared Brahmin and Harijan children from high and low economic backgrounds.

Findings:

  • Poor Harijan children scored the lowest on cognitive tests.
  • Wealth improved scores for Harijan children, but not to the level of Brahmin children.

Takeaway: The combination of economic and social disadvantages undermines cognitive growth.

CISCE: Class 12

Study by Rath, Dash & Dash, 1973

Studied Brahmin, Adivasi, and Harijan children (ages 9-12).

Findings:

  • At age 9, Brahmin children outperformed others.
  • By ages 10-12, the gap between Brahmin and Adivasi children had reduced.

Takeaway: Early schooling can help close achievement gaps.

CISCE: Class 12

Study by Das & Singha, 1974

Compared rural and urban children from the Brahmin and Harijan groups.

Findings:

  • In cities, no intelligence difference between groups.
  • In rural areas, Brahmin children scored higher.

Takeaway: Urban settings can help offset social disadvantages.

CISCE: Class 12

Study by Jachuck & Mohanty, 1974

Tested children from various SES and age groups.

Findings:

  • High-SES children performed better, improving with age.
  • Among low-SES children, older kids performed worse than younger ones.

Takeaway: Without support, disadvantages may worsen as children grow.

CISCE: Class 12

Real-Life Application

  • A child from a low-income family unable to afford books or the internet may lag behind a peer with abundant resources.
  • Urban children may access libraries and better schools, while rural peers face limited learning tools.
CISCE: Class 12

Key Points: Indian Studies on Environment and Intelligence

  • Das, Jachuck & Panda (1968) found that poor Harijan children scored the lowest; wealth helped, but didn’t close caste gaps.
  • Rath, Dash & Dash (1973) showed Brahmin kids scored higher at age 9, but gaps with Adivasi kids narrowed by age 12 due to schooling.
  • Das & Singha (1974) found no group differences in cities, but rural Brahmin children scored better—urban environments reduce social disadvantage.
  • Jachuck & Mohanty (1974) found high-SES children improved with age, but low-SES children declined—lack of support worsens outcomes.
  • These studies show that economic status, caste, and living environment deeply affect children’s intelligence and learning.
 

Test Yourself

Advertisements
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×