Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Equipotential surfaces ______.
- are closer in regions of large electric fields compared to regions of lower electric fields.
- will be more crowded near sharp edges of a conductor.
- will be more crowded near regions of large charge densities.
- will always be equally spaced.
पर्याय
a, b and c
a, c and d
b, c and d
c and d
Advertisements
उत्तर
a, b and c
Explanation:
The density of the equipotential lines gives an idea about the magnitude of electric field. Higher the density, larger the field strength.
We know, the electric field intensity E and electric potential V are related as a, b and c
We know that on any two points of equipotential surface, potential difference is zero or of equal potential.
∵ `E = (-dV)/(dr)`
So the electric field intensity is inversely proportional to the separation between equipotential surfaces.
So equipotential surfaces are closer in regions of large electric. Thus, it verifies answer a
The electric field is larger near the sharp edge, due to larger charge density as a is very small
∵ `sigma = q/A`
So equipotential surfaces are closer or crowded. It verifies answer b.
As the electric field `E = (kq)/r^2` and potential or field decreases as size of the body increases or vice-versa (case of the earth), so the equipotential surfaces will be more crowded if the charge density `sigma = q/A` increases. It verifies the answer c.
As the equipotential surface depends on distance r by `E = (-dV)/r` and `V = (kq)/r`. Equipotential surface depends on charge density at that place which is different at a different place, so equipotential surface are not equispaced all over.
Hence the electric field intensity E is inversely proportional to the separation between equipotential surfaces. So, equipotential surfaces are closer in regions of large electric fields. As electric field intensities is large near sharp edges of charged conductor and near regions of large charge densities. Therefore, equipotential surfaces are closer at such places.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
What are the forms of energy into which the electrical energy of the atmosphere is dissipated during a lightning?
(Hint: The earth has an electric field of about 100 Vm−1 at its surface in the downward direction, corresponding to a surface charge density = −10−9 C m−2. Due to the slight conductivity of the atmosphere up to about 50 km (beyond which it is good conductor), about + 1800 C is pumped every second into the earth as a whole. The earth, however, does not get discharged since thunderstorms and lightning occurring continually all over the globe pump an equal amount of negative charge on the earth.)
Draw equipotential surfaces:
(1) in the case of a single point charge and
(2) in a constant electric field in Z-direction. Why are the equipotential surfaces about a single charge not equidistant?
(3) Can electric field exist tangential to an equipotential surface? Give reason
Why is there no work done in moving a charge from one point to another on an equipotential surface?
Define equipotential surface.
Depict the equipotential surface due to
(i) an electric dipole,
(ii) two identical positive charges separated by a distance.
Write two important characteristics of equipotential surfaces.
Assertion: Electric field is discontinuous across the surface of a spherical charged shell.
Reason: Electric potential is continuous across the surface of a spherical charged shell.
- The potential at all the points on an equipotential surface is same.
- Equipotential surfaces never intersect each other.
- Work done in moving a charge from one point to other on an equipotential surface is zero.
Which of the following is NOT the property of equipotential surface?
Can two equipotential surfaces intersect each other?
Consider a uniform electric field in the ẑ direction. The potential is a constant ______.
- in all space.
- for any x for a given z.
- for any y for a given z.
- on the x-y plane for a given z.
The work done to move a charge along an equipotential from A to B ______.
- cannot be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
- must be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
- is zero.
- can have a non-zero value.
Prove that a closed equipotential surface with no charge within itself must enclose an equipotential volume.
Find the equation of the equipotentials for an infinite cylinder of radius r0, carrying charge of linear density λ.
What is an equipotential surface?
A charge \[q_0\] is moved from point A to point B on the same equipotential surface. If the potentials at A and B are \[V_A\] and \[V_B\] respectively, the work done is:
If the electric field \[\vec{E}\] had a component along (tangent to) an equipotential surface, what contradiction would arise?
What is the shape of the equipotential surfaces for a single point charge (+q)?
For an infinite line charge (infinite cylinder configuration), the equipotential surfaces are:
A point charge of \[1\ \mu\text{C}\] produces a potential \[V = \frac{kq}{r}\]. At what distance from the charge does the potential equal 90 V? (Take \[k = 9 \times 10^9\ \text{N m}^2/\text{C}^2\])
