Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
If `oint_s` E.dS = 0 over a surface, then ______.
- the electric field inside the surface and on it is zero.
- the electric field inside the surface is necessarily uniform.
- the number of flux lines entering the surface must be equal to the number of flux lines leaving it.
- all charges must necessarily be outside the surface.
विकल्प
a and b
b and c
c and d
a and d
Advertisements
उत्तर
c and d
Explanation:
We know electric flux is proportional to the number of electric field lines and the term `oint_s` E.dS represents electric flux over the closed surface.
It means `oint_s` E.dS represents the algebraic sum of the number of flux lines entering the surface and number of flux lines leaving the surface.
If `oint_s` E.dS = 0, this means the number of flux lines entering the surface must be equal to the number of flux lines leaving it.
From Gauss’ law, we know `oint_sE.dS = q/ϵ_0`, here q is the charge enclosed by , the closed surface. If `oint_sE.dS` = 0 then q = 0, i.e., net charge enclosed by the surface must be zero.
Hence all other charges must necessarily be outside the surface. This is because of the fact that charges outside the surface do not contribute to the electric flux.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
State and explain Gauss’s law.
Draw a graph of electric field E(r) with distance r from the centre of the shell for 0 ≤ r ≤ ∞.
A charge Q is placed at the centre of a cube. Find the flux of the electric field through the six surfaces of the cube.
State Gauss’s law for magnetism. Explain its significance.
q1, q2, q3 and q4 are point charges located at points as shown in the figure and S is a spherical gaussian surface of radius R. Which of the following is true according to the Gauss' law?
The Gaussian surface ______.
If there were only one type of charge in the universe, then ______.
- `oint_s` E.dS ≠ 0 on any surface.
- `oint_s` E.dS = 0 if the charge is outside the surface.
- `oint_s` E.dS could not be defined.
- `oint_s` E.dS = `q/ε_0` if charges of magnitude q were inside the surface.
Consider a region inside which there are various types of charges but the total charge is zero. At points outside the region
- the electric field is necessarily zero.
- the electric field is due to the dipole moment of the charge distribution only.
- the dominant electric field is `∞ 1/r^3`, for large r, where r is the distance from a origin in this region.
- the work done to move a charged particle along a closed path, away from the region, will be zero.
Refer to the arrangement of charges in figure and a Gaussian surface of radius R with Q at the centre. Then
- total flux through the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/ε_0`.
- field on the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/(4 piε_0 R^2)`.
- flux through the surface of sphere due to 5Q is zero.
- field on the surface of sphere due to –2Q is same everywhere.
An arbitrary surface encloses a dipole. What is the electric flux through this surface?
If the total charge enclosed by a surface is zero, does it imply that the elecric field everywhere on the surface is zero? Conversely, if the electric field everywhere on a surface is zero, does it imply that net charge inside is zero.
In 1959 Lyttleton and Bondi suggested that the expansion of the Universe could be explained if matter carried a net charge. Suppose that the Universe is made up of hydrogen atoms with a number density N, which is maintained a constant. Let the charge on the proton be: ep = – (1 + y)e where e is the electronic charge.
- Find the critical value of y such that expansion may start.
- Show that the velocity of expansion is proportional to the distance from the centre.
In the diagram, the total electric flux through the closed surface ‘S’ is:
[Given q = charge ε0 = permittivity of free space]
