Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
If the total charge enclosed by a surface is zero, does it imply that the elecric field everywhere on the surface is zero? Conversely, if the electric field everywhere on a surface is zero, does it imply that net charge inside is zero.
Advertisements
Solution
According to Gauss’ law, the flux associated with any closed surface is given by `int_s` E.dS = `q_(enclosed)/ε_0`. The term `q_(enclosed)` on the right side of the equation includes the sum of all charges enclosed by the surface called (Gaussian surface).
In the left side equation, the electric field is due to all the charges present both inside as well as outside the Gaussian surface.
Thus, despite being total charge enclosed by a surface zero, it doesn’t imply that the electric field everywhere on the surface is zero, the field may be normal to the surface.
Also, conversely if the electric field everywhere on a surface is zero.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
State and explain Gauss’s law.
A point charge +10 μC is a distance 5 cm directly above the centre of a square of side 10 cm, as shown in the Figure. What is the magnitude of the electric flux through the square? (Hint: Think of the square as one face of a cube with edge 10 cm.)
Draw a graph of electric field E(r) with distance r from the centre of the shell for 0 ≤ r ≤ ∞.
State Gauss’s law for magnetism. Explain its significance.
Answer the following question.
State Gauss's law for magnetism. Explain its significance.
Gaussian surface cannot pass through discrete charge because ____________.
Which of the following statements is not true about Gauss’s law?
Gauss' law helps in ______
Refer to the arrangement of charges in figure and a Gaussian surface of radius R with Q at the centre. Then
- total flux through the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/ε_0`.
- field on the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/(4 piε_0 R^2)`.
- flux through the surface of sphere due to 5Q is zero.
- field on the surface of sphere due to –2Q is same everywhere.
In 1959 Lyttleton and Bondi suggested that the expansion of the Universe could be explained if matter carried a net charge. Suppose that the Universe is made up of hydrogen atoms with a number density N, which is maintained a constant. Let the charge on the proton be: ep = – (1 + y)e where e is the electronic charge.
- Find the critical value of y such that expansion may start.
- Show that the velocity of expansion is proportional to the distance from the centre.
In finding the electric field using Gauss law the formula `|vec"E"| = "q"_"enc"/(epsilon_0|"A"|)` is applicable. In the formula ε0 is permittivity of free space, A is the area of Gaussian surface and qenc is charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface. This equation can be used in which of the following situation?
In the diagram, the total electric flux through the closed surface ‘S’ is:
[Given q = charge ε0 = permittivity of free space]
For a Gaussian surface to be convenient for calculations, the electric field should be:
According to Gauss's Law, the total electric flux through a closed surface depends on:
The integral form of Gauss's Law is given by:
In the context of Gauss's Law, what does the area element vector dS represent?
For a uniformly charged thin spherical shell of radius R with total charge Q, the electric field outside the shell (r > R) is:
In a non-uniform electric field given by \[\vec{E} = \alpha x^{1/2} \hat{i}\] with \[\alpha = 800 \text{ N C}^{-1}\text{m}^{-1/2}\], the flux through a cube of side a = 0.1 m oriented with faces perpendicular to the x-axis is approximately:
