हिंदी

Find the amount of work done in rotating an electric dipole of dipole moment 3.2 x 10- 8Cm from its position of stable equilibrium to the position of unstable equilibriu

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Find the amount of work done in rotating an electric dipole of dipole moment 3.2 x 10- 8Cm from its position of stable equilibrium to the position of unstable equilibrium in a uniform electric field if intensity 104 N/C.  

योग
Advertisements

उत्तर

Given: p = 3.2 x 10- 8Cm, E = 104 N/C 

To Find: Work done in rotating dipole (W)

Formula: W = pE (cos θ0 - cos θ) 

Calculation: 

At stable equilibrium, θ0 = 0° 

At unstable equilibrium, θ = 180° 

From formula,

W = pE (cos θ0 - cos θ) 

= 3.2 × 10-8 × 104 (cos 0 - cos 180)

= 3.2 × 10-4 [1 - (-1)] 

= 6.4 × 10-4 J

Work done in rotating an electric dipole is 6.4 × 10-4 J.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 8: Electrostatics - Short Answer II

संबंधित प्रश्न

Define an equipotential surface.


A regular hexagon of side 10 cm has a charge 5 µC at each of its vertices. Calculate the potential at the centre of the hexagon.


Two charges 2 μC and −2 µC are placed at points A and B 6 cm apart.

  1. Identify an equipotential surface of the system.
  2. What is the direction of the electric field at every point on this surface?

The top of the atmosphere is at about 400 kV with respect to the surface of the earth, corresponding to an electric field that decreases with altitude. Near the surface of the earth, the field is about 100 Vm−1. Why then do we not get an electric shock as we step out of our house into the open? (Assume the house to be a steel cage so there is no field inside!)


A man fixes outside his house one evening a two metre high insulating slab carrying on its top a large aluminium sheet of area 1 m2. Will he get an electric shock if he touches the metal sheet next morning?


Draw equipotential surfaces:

(1) in the case of a single point charge and

(2) in a constant electric field in Z-direction. Why are the equipotential surfaces about a single charge not equidistant?

(3) Can electric field exist tangential to an equipotential surface? Give reason


What is the geometrical shape of equipotential surfaces due to a single isolated charge?


Depict the equipotential surfaces for a system of two identical positive point charges placed a distance(d) apart?


Two identical point charges, q each, are kept 2m apart in the air. A third point charge Q of unknown magnitude and sign is placed on the line joining the charges such that the system remains in equilibrium. Find the position and nature of Q.


Draw the equipotential surfaces due to an electric dipole.


Write two important characteristics of equipotential surfaces.


Statement - 1: For practical purpose, the earth is used as a reference at zero potential in electrical circuits.

Statement - 2: The electrical potential of a sphere of radius R with charge Q uniformly distributed on the surface is given by `Q/(4piepsilon_0R)`.


Consider the following statements and select the correct statement(s).

  1. Electric field lines are always perpendicular to equipotential surface.
  2. No two equipotential surfaces can intersect each other.
  3. Electric field lines are in the direction of tangent to an equipotential surface.

Equipotentials at a great distance from a collection of charges whose total sum is not zero are approximately.


Equipotential surfaces ______.


Can two equipotential surfaces intersect each other? 


The work done to move a charge along an equipotential from A to B ______.

  1. cannot be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
  2. must be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
  3. is zero.
  4. can have a non-zero value.

Find the equation of the equipotentials for an infinite cylinder of radius r0, carrying charge of linear density λ.


What is meant by an equipotential surface?


In the hierarchy of equipotential concepts, which term describes a volume enclosed at the same potential?


The surface of any conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential surface because:


In a uniform electric field, the equipotential surfaces take the shape of:


In the derivation proving \[\vec{E}\] is perpendicular to an equipotential surface, a charge \[q_0\] undergoes a small displacement \[d\vec{l}\] along the surface, with \[\vec{E}\] making an angle \[\theta\] with the displacement. Equating the work expressions leads to which conclusion?


The relation between the electric field \[\vec{E}\] and the potential gradient is expressed as:


A particle floats between two parallel plates separated by 0.1 m with a potential difference of 4000 V. The particle carries a charge of \[1.6 \times 10^{-19}\] C. Taking \[g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2\], the mass of the particle is approximately:


A point charge of \[1\ \mu\text{C}\] produces a potential \[V = \frac{kq}{r}\]. At what distance from the charge does the potential equal 90 V? (Take \[k = 9 \times 10^9\ \text{N m}^2/\text{C}^2\])


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×