Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Define the terms "stopping potential' and 'threshold frequency' in relation to the photoelectric effect. How does one determine these physical quantities using Einstein's equation?
Advertisements
उत्तर
Stopping potential:
For a particular frequency of incident radiation, the minimum negative (retarding) potential V0 given to the anode plate for which the photocurrent stops or becomes zero is called the cut-off or stopping potential.
Threshold frequency:
There exists a certain minimum cut-off frequency ν0, for which the stopping potential is zero and below ν0 the electron emission is not possible.
This cut-off frequency is known as threshold frequency ν0, which is different for different metal. In the photoelectric effect, an electron absorbs a quantum of energy (hν ) of radiation. If this quantum of energy absorbed by electron exceeds the minimum energy required to come out of the metal surface by electron, the kinetic energy of the emitted electron is
`"K" = "hv" - phi` ...(1)
Where `phi` is the minimum energy for electron to come out of the metal, and is different for different electrons in the metal. The maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is given by
`"K""max" = "hv" - phi0` ...(2)
Where, `phi0 - ` work function or least value of φ equation (2) is known as Einstein's photoelectric equation.
Explanation of photoelectric effect with the help of Einstein's photoelectric equation
(i) According to equation (2), Kmax depends linearly on ν, and is independent of the intensity of radiation. This happens because, here, the photoelectric effect arises from the absorption of a single quantum of radiation by a single electron. The intensity of the radiation (that is proportional to the number of energy quanta per unit area per unit time) is irrelevant to this basic process.
(ii) Since Kmax must be non-negative, equation (2) implies that photoelectric emission is possible only if h ν > `phi0`.
or v > v0, where v0 = `"V"_0 = phi_0/"h"`
Thus, there exists a threshold frequency v0 `"V"_0 = phi_0/"h"` exists, below which photoelectric emission is not possible, and is independent of intensity.
(iii) As the intensity of radiation is proportional to the number of energy quanta per unit area per unit time. The greater the number of energy quanta available, the greater is the number of electrons absorbing the energy quanta, and therefore, the number of electrons coming out of the metal (for ν > ν0) is more and so is photoelectric current.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
(a) Estimate the speed with which electrons emitted from a heated emitter of an evacuated tube impinge on the collector maintained at a potential difference of 500 V with respect to the emitter. Ignore the small initial speeds of the electrons. The specific charge of the electron, i.e., its e/m is given to be 1.76 × 1011 C kg−1.
(b) Use the same formula you employ in (a) to obtain electron speed for an collector potential of 10 MV. Do you see what is wrong? In what way is the formula to be modified?
Can a photon be deflected by an electric field? Or by a magnetic field?
The equation E = pc is valid
When stopping potential is applied in an experiment on photoelectric effect, no photoelectric is observed. This means that
The work function of a photoelectric material is 4.0 eV. (a) What is the threshold wavelength? (b) Find the wavelength of light for which the stopping potential is 2.5 V.
(Use h = 6.63 × 10-34J-s = 4.14 × 10-15 eV-s, c = 3 × 108 m/s and me = 9.1 × 10-31kg)
Do all the electrons that absorb a photon come out as photoelectrons?
The work function for a metal surface is 4.14 eV. The threshold wavelength for this metal surface is ______.
How would the stopping potential for a given photosensitive surface change if the intensity of incident radiation was decreased? Justify your answer.
A metallic plate exposed to white light emits electrons. For which of the following colours of light, the stopping potential will be maximum?
Which of the following options represents the variation of photoelectric current with property of light shown on the x-axis?




