English

Without using truth table, show that ~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Without using truth table, show that

~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

L.H.S.

≡ ~r → ~ (p ∧ q)

≡ ~(~ r) ∨ ~ (p ∧ q)       ....[p → q ≡ ~ p ∨ q]

≡ r ∨ ~(p ∧ q)             ....[Negation of negation]

≡ r ∨ (~p ∨ ~q)           ....[De Morgan’s law]

≡ ~p ∨ (~q ∨ r)         .....[Commutative and associative law]

≡ ~p ∨ (q → r)          ....[p → q ≡ ~ p ∨ q]

≡ (q → r) ∨ ~p            ......[Commutative law]

≡ ~[~ (q → r)] ∨ ~ p     ......[Negation of negation]

≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p        .....[p → q ≡ ~ p ∨ q]

= R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [Page 22]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :

The Sun sets in the East. 


Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement : 

cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R 


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p


Without using truth table prove that:

∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Without using truth table, show that

p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p


Without using truth table, show that

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)


Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


Without using truth table prove that

[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×