Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Without using truth table, show that
p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p
Advertisements
Solution
L.H.S.
≡ p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q]
≡ p ∧ [(~ p ∨ (q ∨ ~ q)] ...[Associative law]
≡ p ∧ (~ p ∨ T) ...[Complement law]
≡ p ∧ T ...[Identity law]
≡ p ...[Identity law]
≡ R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?
(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8
(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5
(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9
(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9
Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following:
(a) p ∧ (q → r)
(b) ~P ∨ ~q
Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :
The Sun sets in the East.
Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement :
cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
If a man is a judge then he is honest.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.
Without using truth table prove that:
∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
p ∧ (q ∨ r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______
The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.
The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______
If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.
Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______.
Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.
Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.
The logically equivalent statement of \[\left(\sim p\wedge q\right)\vee\left(\sim p\wedge\sim q\right)\] \[\vee\left(\ p\wedge\sim q\right)\] is
