English

Without using truth table, show that p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

L.H.S.

≡ p ↔ q

≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)

≡ (~p ∨ q) ∧ (~q ∨ p)

≡ [~ p ∧ (~ q ∨ p)] ∨ [q ∧ (~ q ∨ p)]     ....[Distributive law]

≡ [(~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ p)] ∨ [(q ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ p)]     .....[Distributive Law]

≡ [(~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ F] ∨ [F ∨ (q ∧ p)]  ....[Complement Law]

≡ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ p)   ....[Identity Law]

≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)    ....[Commutative Law]

≡ R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [Page 22]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Without using truth table prove that:

∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Without using truth table, show that

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.


Which of the following is not a statement?


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×