English

Without using truth table, show that (p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Without using truth table, show that

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

L.H.S.

≡ (p ∨ q) → r

≡ ~ (p ∨ q) ∨ r          ....[p → q → ~ p ∨ q]

≡ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ r       ....[De Morgan’s law] 

≡ (~ p ∨ r) ∧ (~ q ∨ r)       .....[Distributive law]

≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)             .....[p → q → ~ p ∨ q]

= R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [Page 22]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Without using truth table, show that

~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______ 


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


Which of the following is not a statement?


Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______. 


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×