मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Without using truth table, show that (p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Without using truth table, show that

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)

बेरीज
Advertisements

उत्तर

L.H.S.

≡ (p ∨ q) → r

≡ ~ (p ∨ q) ∨ r          ....[p → q → ~ p ∨ q]

≡ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ r       ....[De Morgan’s law] 

≡ (~ p ∨ r) ∧ (~ q ∨ r)       .....[Distributive law]

≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)             .....[p → q → ~ p ∨ q]

= R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [पृष्ठ २२]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
पाठ 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.9 | Q 1.5 | पृष्ठ २२

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement : 

cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R 


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)


Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).


The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table prove that

[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r


The logically equivalent statement of \[\left(\sim p\wedge q\right)\vee\left(\sim p\wedge\sim q\right)\] \[\vee\left(\ p\wedge\sim q\right)\] is


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×