मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Without using truth table, show that ~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q

बेरीज
Advertisements

उत्तर

L.H.S.

≡ ~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q]

≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ ~ (~ q)   ....[Negation of implication]

≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ q      .....[Negation of a negation]

≡ p ∧ (q ∧ q)     ....[Associative law]

≡ p ∧ q          .....[Idempotent law]

≡ R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [पृष्ठ २२]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
पाठ 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.9 | Q 1.3 | पृष्ठ २२

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Without using the truth table show that P ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)


If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :

The Sun sets in the East. 


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Without using truth table, show that

~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______ 


If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.


Which of the following is not a statement?


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


Without using truth table prove that

[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×