Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)
Advertisements
उत्तर
L.H.S.
= (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ [(p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)] ....[Associative Law]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ [(~q ∧ p) ∨ (~ q ∧ ~ p)] ....[Commutative Law]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ [~q ∧ (p ∨ ~ p)] ....[Distributive Law]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~q ∧ t) .....[Complement Law]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~q) .....[Identity Law]
≡ (p ∨ ~ q) ∧ (q ∨ ~q) .....[Distributive Law]
≡ (p ∨ ~ q) ∧ t ....[Complement Law]
≡ p ∨ ~ q .....[Identity Law]
= R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :
The Sun sets in the East.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
If a man is a judge then he is honest.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).
Without using truth table prove that:
∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p → q) ∧ r
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Without using truth table, show that
p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p
Without using truth table, show that
~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).
The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.
(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______
The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______
Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q
Which of the following is not a statement?
Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.
The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.
Without using truth table prove that
[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r
The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.
