मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी विज्ञान (सामान्य) इयत्ता १२ वी

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.

पर्याय

  • p ∨ ( ~q ∨ r )

  • ~p ∧ ( q → r )

  • ~p ∧ ( ~q → ~r )

  • ~p ∨ ( q ∧ ~r )

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

~ [P ∧ (q → r)

=~[( P)] ∨ [~ (q → r)]                             ...(By De Morgan's law)
=~[( P)] ∨ [~ (~q ∨ r )]                           ...(By Conditional Law)
=~[( P)] ∨ [( q ∧ ~r )]                             ...(By De Morgan's law)

~ [ P ∧ ( q → r )] = ~ P ∨ ( q ∧ ~r ) 

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2015-2016 (March)

APPEARS IN

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Without using the truth table show that P ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)


If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :

The Sun sets in the East. 


Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement : 

cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R 


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

p ∧ (q ∨ r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


Which of the following is not a statement?


Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______. 


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


Without using truth table prove that

[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×