Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Without using truth table, show that
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Advertisements
उत्तर
L.H.S.
≡ p ↔ q
≡ (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
≡ (~p ∨ q) ∧ (~q ∨ p)
≡ [~ p ∧ (~ q ∨ p)] ∨ [q ∧ (~ q ∨ p)] ....[Distributive law]
≡ [(~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ p)] ∨ [(q ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ p)] .....[Distributive Law]
≡ [(~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ F] ∨ [F ∨ (q ∧ p)] ....[Complement Law]
≡ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ p) ....[Identity Law]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ....[Commutative Law]
≡ R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following:
(a) p ∧ (q → r)
(b) ~P ∨ ~q
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
If a man is a judge then he is honest.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p → q) ∧ r
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)
The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.
For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______
(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______
The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______
The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______
The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.
The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______
The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______
Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q
If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.
Which of the following is not a statement?
∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.
Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.
