Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Without using truth table, show that
~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q
Advertisements
Solution
L.H.S.
≡ ~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ ~ (~ q) ....[Negation of implication]
≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ q .....[Negation of a negation]
≡ p ∧ (q ∧ q) ....[Associative law]
≡ p ∧ q .....[Idempotent law]
≡ R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following:
(a) p ∧ (q → r)
(b) ~P ∨ ~q
Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement :
cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
If a man is a judge then he is honest.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.
Without using truth table prove that:
(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p
Without using truth table prove that:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q
Without using truth table prove that:
∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
p ∧ (q ∨ r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p → q) ∧ r
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
Without using truth table, show that
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______
The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______
(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.
The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______
Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______.
∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.
Without using truth table prove that
[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r
The logically equivalent statement of \[\left(\sim p\wedge q\right)\vee\left(\sim p\wedge\sim q\right)\] \[\vee\left(\ p\wedge\sim q\right)\] is
