English

Without using truth table, show that ~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

L.H.S.

≡ ~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q]

≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ ~ (~ q)   ....[Negation of implication]

≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ q      .....[Negation of a negation]

≡ p ∧ (q ∧ q)     ....[Associative law]

≡ p ∧ q          .....[Idempotent law]

≡ R.H.S.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.9 [Page 22]

APPEARS IN

RELATED QUESTIONS

Without using truth tabic show that ~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q) = ~p


Without using the truth table show that P ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)


If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Which of the following is not a statement?


Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______. 


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


The logically equivalent statement of \[\left(\sim p\wedge q\right)\vee\left(\sim p\wedge\sim q\right)\] \[\vee\left(\ p\wedge\sim q\right)\] is


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×