English

Using rules in logic, prove the following: ∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
≡ (p ∧ ∼p) ∨ (q ∧ ∼p) .....(Distributive Law)
≡ F ∨ (q ∧ ∼p) ...........(Complement Law)
≡ q ∧ ∼p ...........(Identity Law)
≡ ∼p ∧ q .............(Commutative Law)
∴ ∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 34]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Arts and Science) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 10.2 | Page 34

RELATED QUESTIONS

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.


If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Write the Truth Value of the Negation of the Following Statement :

The Sun sets in the East. 


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

p ∧ (q ∨ r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Without using truth table, show that

~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.


Which of the following is not a statement?


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Show that the simplified form of (p ∧ q ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (r ∧ p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∨ q) is q ∨ ∼ p.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×