English

Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then. If a man is a judge then he is honest. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

Since p → q ≡ ∼ p ∨ q, the given statement can be written as:
A man is not a judge or he is honest.

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.4 [Page 21]

RELATED QUESTIONS

The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.


Without using truth tabic show that ~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q) = ~p


Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following: 

(a) p ∧ (q → r)

(b)  ~P ∨ ~q


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q


Without using truth table, show that

~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p


Without using truth table, show that

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q).


The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.


For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______ 


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______ 


(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.


The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______ 


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table prove that (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) v (p∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


Which of the following is not a statement?


Negation of the Boolean expression `p Leftrightarrow (q \implies p)` is ______. 


∼ ((∼ p) ∧ q) is equal to ______.


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


Without using truth table prove that

[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×