Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Write orbital notations for the electron in orbitals with the following quantum numbers.
n = 4, l = 2
Advertisements
Solution
4d
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Using s, p, d notations, describe the orbital with the following quantum numbers n = 1, l = 0.
Choose the correct option.
p-orbitals are _________ in shape.
Choose the correct option.
“No two electrons in the same atoms can have identical set of four quantum numbers”. This statement is known as -
Write orbital notations for the electron in orbitals with the following quantum numbers.
n = 2, l = 1
Write condensed orbital notation of electronic configuration of the following element:
Carbon (Z = 6)
Write condensed orbital notation of electronic configuration of the following element:
Chlorine (Z = 17)
Draw shapes of 2s orbitals.
Explain in brief, the significance of the azimuthal quantum number.
Using the concept of quantum numbers, calculate the maximum numbers of electrons present in the ‘M’ shell. Give their distribution in shells, subshells, and orbitals.
Indicate the number of unpaired electrons in \[\ce{Si}\] (Z = 14).
The principal quantum number (n) and magnetic quantum number (ml) for the valence electrons of rubidium atom (Z = 37) are ____________ respectively.
The designation of a subshell with n = 6 and l = 2 is ____________.
The three electrons have the following set of quantum numbers:
X = 6, 1, −1, `+1/2`
Y = 6, 0, 0, `+1/2`
Z = 5, 1, 0, `+1/2`
Identify the CORRECT statement.
How many electrons can fit in the orbital for which n = 4 and l = 2?
Which one of the following is NOT possible?
Total number of orbitals associated with third shell will be ______.
The pair of ions having same electronic configuration is ______.
Out of the following pairs of electrons, identify the pairs of electrons present in degenerate orbitals:
| (i) | (a) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = -2, m_s = - 1/2` |
| (b) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = -1, m_s = - 1/2` | |
| (ii) | (a) `n = 3, l = 1, m_l = 1, m_s = + 1/2` |
| (b) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = 1, m_s = + 1/2` | |
| (iii) | (a) `n = 4, l = 1, m_l = 1, m_s = + 1/2` |
| (b) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = 1, m_s = + 1/2` | |
| (iv) | (a) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = +2, m_s = - 1/2` |
| (b) `n = 3, l = 2, m_l = +2, m_s = + 1/2` |
Which of the following sets of quantum numbers are correct?
| `n` | `l` | `m_l` | |
| (i) | 1 | 1 | +2 |
| (ii) | 2 | 1 | +1 |
| (iii) | 3 | 2 | –2 |
| (iv) | 3 | 4 | –2 |
The arrangement of orbitals on the basis of energy is based upon their (n + l) value. Lower the value of (n + l), lower is the energy. For orbitals having same values of (n + l), the orbital with lower value of n will have lower energy.
Based upon the above information, arrange the following orbitals in the increasing order of energy.
4s, 3s, 3p, 4d
The arrangement of orbitals on the basis of energy is based upon their (n + l) value. Lower the value of (n + l), lower is the energy. For orbitals having same values of (n + l), the orbital with lower value of n will have lower energy.
Based upon the above information, solve the questions given below:
Which of the following orbitals has the lowest energy?
5p, 5d, 5f, 6s, 6p
The electronic configuration of valence shell of Cu is 3d104s1 and not 3d94s2. How is this configuration explained?
Match the following species with their corresponding ground state electronic configuration.
| Atom / Ion | Electronic configuration |
| (i) \[\ce{Cu}\] | (a) 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 |
| (ii) \[\ce{Cu^{2+}}\] | (b) 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 |
| (iii) \[\ce{Zn^{2+}}\] | (c) 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s1 |
| (iv) \[\ce{Cr^{3+}}\] | (d) 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d9 |
| (e) 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d3 |
Match species given in Column I with the electronic configuration given in Column II.
| Column I | Column II |
| (i) \[\ce{Cr}\] | (a) [Ar]3d84s0 |
| (ii) \[\ce{Fe^{2+}}\] | (b) [Ar]3d104s1 |
| (iii) \[\ce{Ni^{2+}}\] | (c) [Ar]3d64s0 |
| (iv) \[\ce{Cu}\] | (d) [Ar] 3d54s1 |
| (e) [Ar]3d64s2 |
Which of the following is the correct plot for the probability density ψ2 (r) as a function of distance 'r' of the electron from the nucleus for 2s orbitals?
