Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
Solution
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Important Words:
Devagiri
Important Words:
Token currency
Fill in the blanks:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq shifted his capital from _________ to _____________.
Fill in the blank:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq introduced ________ coins in place of gold and silver coins
State whether the following statement is True Or False:
Firoz Shah Tughlaq was Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s son.
What was the consequence of Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s project of shifting his capital?
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
Give one example to show that Firoze Shah was concerned about the welfare of his poor subjects.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
Why did Muhammad bin Tughlaq abandon his scheme of territorial expansion?
