Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
Solution
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Important Words:
Devagiri
Important Words:
Token currency
State weather the following statement is True Or False:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq is known as a ‘mixture of opposites’.
State whether the following statement is True Or False:
Firoz Shah Tughlaq was Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s son.
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
Choose the correct answer:
Most historians have traced the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes to his _____________.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq was a diligent ruler who undertook projects that were brilliantly conceived and executed.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq stayed in Daulatabad for 5 years.
Mention any one economic reform introduced in the Doab region by Firoze Shah Tughlaq.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
