Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Important Words:
Devagiri
Fill in the blanks:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq shifted his capital from _________ to _____________.
Fill in the blank:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq introduced ________ coins in place of gold and silver coins
State whether the following statement is True Or False:
Firoz Shah Tughlaq was Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s son.
What was the consequence of Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s project of shifting his capital?
Give Reason why:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s toktn currency failed.
Match the Columns:
| A | B |
| 1. Jalaluddin Khilji | (a) Shahna |
| 2. Alauddin Khilji | (b) Malwa |
| 3. Chanderi | (c) a mild and pious man |
| 4. Warangal | (d) a briliant general and a shrewd administrator |
| 5. Price Control | (e) Deccan |
| 6. Firoz Shah Tuqhlaq | (f) Afghan |
| 7. Sikandar Lodi | (g) Welfare schemes |
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq was a diligent ruler who undertook projects that were brilliantly conceived and executed.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq stayed in Daulatabad for 5 years.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
