Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Important Words:
Devagiri
Fill in the blanks:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq shifted his capital from _________ to _____________.
State whether the following statement is True Or False:
Firoz Shah Tughlaq was Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s son.
Give Reason why:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s toktn currency failed.
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
Fill in the blanks:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq realized the importance of a strong and powerful _____ to strengthen and secure the position of the _________. He needed additional _________ to increase military resources.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq was a diligent ruler who undertook projects that were brilliantly conceived and executed.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq stayed in Daulatabad for 5 years.
Give one example to show that Firoze Shah was concerned about the welfare of his poor subjects.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
