Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Important Words:
Devagiri
Why is Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq called an ill-starred idealist?
Give Reason why:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s toktn currency failed.
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
Fill in the blanks:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq realized the importance of a strong and powerful _____ to strengthen and secure the position of the _________. He needed additional _________ to increase military resources.
Match the Columns:
| A | B |
| 1. Jalaluddin Khilji | (a) Shahna |
| 2. Alauddin Khilji | (b) Malwa |
| 3. Chanderi | (c) a mild and pious man |
| 4. Warangal | (d) a briliant general and a shrewd administrator |
| 5. Price Control | (e) Deccan |
| 6. Firoz Shah Tuqhlaq | (f) Afghan |
| 7. Sikandar Lodi | (g) Welfare schemes |
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq was a diligent ruler who undertook projects that were brilliantly conceived and executed.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s of increasing the taxes in the Ganga-Yamuna Doab region led to the development of agriculture in that region
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq stayed in Daulatabad for 5 years.
Mention any one economic reform introduced in the Doab region by Firoze Shah Tughlaq.
