Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Important Words:
Devagiri
State whether the following statement is True Or False:
Firoz Shah Tughlaq was Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s son.
What was the consequence of Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s project of shifting his capital?
Give Reason why:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq’s toktn currency failed.
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq was a diligent ruler who undertook projects that were brilliantly conceived and executed.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s of increasing the taxes in the Ganga-Yamuna Doab region led to the development of agriculture in that region
Mention any one economic reform introduced in the Doab region by Firoze Shah Tughlaq.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
Answer the question in one or two words/sentences
Why did Muhammad bin Tughlaq abandon his scheme of territorial expansion?
