Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Refer to the arrangement of charges in figure and a Gaussian surface of radius R with Q at the centre. Then
- total flux through the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/ε_0`.
- field on the surface of the sphere is `(-Q)/(4 piε_0 R^2)`.
- flux through the surface of sphere due to 5Q is zero.
- field on the surface of sphere due to –2Q is same everywhere.
पर्याय
a and d
a and c
b and d
c and d
Advertisements
उत्तर
a and c
Explanation:
From Gauss' law, we know `oint_s vecE * dvecS = q_(enclosed)/ε_0`.
Thus, from figure, Total charge inside the Gaussian surface `q_(enclosed)` = Q – 2Q = – Q
The charge 5Q lies outside the surface, thus it makes no contribution to electric flux through the given surface.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
State and explain Gauss’s law.
A point charge +10 μC is a distance 5 cm directly above the centre of a square of side 10 cm, as shown in the Figure. What is the magnitude of the electric flux through the square? (Hint: Think of the square as one face of a cube with edge 10 cm.)
A thin conducting spherical shell of radius R has charge Q spread uniformly over its surface. Using Gauss’s law, derive an expression for an electric field at a point outside the shell.
Draw a graph of electric field E(r) with distance r from the centre of the shell for 0 ≤ r ≤ ∞.
Answer the following question.
State Gauss's law for magnetism. Explain its significance.
State Gauss's law in electrostatics. Show, with the help of a suitable example along with the figure, that the outward flux due to a point charge 'q'. in vacuum within a closed surface, is independent of its size or shape and is given by `q/ε_0`
q1, q2, q3 and q4 are point charges located at points as shown in the figure and S is a spherical gaussian surface of radius R. Which of the following is true according to the Gauss' law?
The Gaussian surface ______.
Which of the following statements is not true about Gauss’s law?
The Electric flux through the surface
 (i) |
 (ii) |
 (iii) |
 (iv) |
If the total charge enclosed by a surface is zero, does it imply that the elecric field everywhere on the surface is zero? Conversely, if the electric field everywhere on a surface is zero, does it imply that net charge inside is zero.
In 1959 Lyttleton and Bondi suggested that the expansion of the Universe could be explained if matter carried a net charge. Suppose that the Universe is made up of hydrogen atoms with a number density N, which is maintained a constant. Let the charge on the proton be: ep = – (1 + y)e where e is the electronic charge.
- Find the critical value of y such that expansion may start.
- Show that the velocity of expansion is proportional to the distance from the centre.
The region between two concentric spheres of radii a < b contain volume charge density ρ(r) = `"c"/"r"`, where c is constant and r is radial- distanct from centre no figure needed. A point charge q is placed at the origin, r = 0. Value of c is in such a way for which the electric field in the region between the spheres is constant (i.e. independent of r). Find the value of c:
A charge Q is placed at the centre of a cube. The electric flux through one of its faces is ______.
A charge of +5 μC is placed at the centre of two concentric spheres of radii r1 = 3 cm and r2 = 5 cm. The ratio of the flux through sphere of radius r1 to that through sphere of radius r2 will be ______.
