Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some vegetables are fruits.
II. No fruit is black.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are vegetables.
II. No vegetable is black.
Options
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
Solution
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Read the following statement considering them to be true and therefore judge their conclusions numbered I, II and III and given your answer accordingly.
Statements: Some tables are chairs. All chairs are benches. All benches are desks.
Conclusions:
I. Some desks are table
II. Some benches are tables.
III. Some desks are chairs.
In the following question, certain statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Consider the statement(s) to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which one of the conclusions logically follows from the statement(s).
Statements: The best way to escape from a problem is to solve it.
Conclusions:
I. Your life will be dull if you don’t face problems.
II. To escape from problems, you should always have some solutions with you.
Choose the correct option:
The passage below is followed by a question based on it. Read the passage choose the best answer to the question.
A study of native-born residents in Delhi found that two-thirds of the children developed considerable levels of nearsightedness after starting school, while their illiterate parents and grandparents, who had no opportunity for formal schooling, showed no signs of this disability.
If the above statements are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?
Statement: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.
Conclusions:
I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.
II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some banks are colleges.
- All colleges are schools.
Conclusions
- At least some banks are schools.
- All schools are colleges.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some exams are tests.
- No exam is a question.
Conclusions
- No question is a test.
- Some tests are definitely not exams.
The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All calculators are boxes.
- All boxes are taps.
- Some taps are machines.
Conclusions
- Some machines are boxes.
- Some taps are calculators.
- Some boxes are calculators.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. No moon is red. All-stars are the moon. All stars are red.
Argument 2. All doors are open. No open is outdoors. All doors are not outdoors.
Argument 3. No Japanese can fire. All Chinese are books. Japanese and Chinese can fight.
Argument 4. No A is B. No B is C. No A is C.
Three statements are given, following by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: Some advocates are doctors. Some doctors are players. All players are engineers.
Conclusions:
- Some players are doctors.
- Some engineers are advocates.
- All advocates are engineers.
- Some engineers are doctors.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and IL Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: No bowler is a batsman.
Some bowlers are fielders.
Conclusions:
- No fielder is a batsman.
- No batsman is a bowler.
