Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some vegetables are fruits.
II. No fruit is black.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are vegetables.
II. No vegetable is black.
पर्याय
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
उत्तर
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Statement: The distance of 900 km by road between Bombay and Jafra will be reduced to 280 km by sea. This will lead to a saving of Rs. 7.92 crores per annum on fuel.
Conclusions
I. Transportation by sea is cheaper than that by road.
II. Fuel must be saved to the greatest extent.
Statement: This book 'Z' is the only book that focuses its attention on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980.
Conclusions:
I. There was no question of poverty before 1950.
II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Some cats are animals.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are plants.
Conclusions:
- Some cats are plants.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are cats.
- All plants are cats.
Statement: The Cabinet of State X took certain steps to tackle the milk glut in the state as the cooperatives and government dairies failed to use the available milk. — A news report.
Conclusions:
I. The milk production of State X is more than its need.
II. The Government and co-operative dairies in State X are not equipped in terms of resources and technology to handle such excess milk.
Statement: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.
Conclusions:
I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.
II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
In the following question, compares two statements. You have to take the statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
I. Some beautiful women are actresses.
II. All actresses are good dancers.
Which of the following derivations is correct?
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
(1) No moon is red. All stars are the moon. All stars are not red.
(2) All doors are open. No open is outdoors. All doors are not outdoors.
(3) No Japanese can fire. All Chinese are books. Japanese and Chinese can fight.
(4) No A is B. No B is C. No A is C.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some banks are colleges.
- All colleges are schools.
Conclusions
- At least some banks are schools.
- All schools are colleges.
The question below is given three statements followed by four Conclusions I, II, III, and IV. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some dogs are rats.
- All rats are trees.
- Some trees are not dogs.
Conclusions
- Some trees are dogs.
- All dogs are trees.
- All rats are dogs.
- No tree is a dog.
In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Statements:
- All rods are sticks.
- No stick ls a pole.
Conclusion:
- All poles being rods is a possibility.
- Some sticks are not rods.
