Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some vegetables are fruits.
II. No fruit is black.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are vegetables.
II. No vegetable is black.
पर्याय
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
उत्तर
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The questions below have two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
I. All persons who have done any creative work can be responsible critics
II. Z has not done any creative work
III. Therefore __________________
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- No tree is a flower
- Some trees are fruits
Conclusions:
- Fruits that are trees are not flowers.
- No fruit is a flower.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage
- Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger
- Cabbage is not tastier than peas
Six statements are given. Below them sets of three statements are given. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two statements to be correct.
(A) Some cleaners are janitors.
(B) All cleaners are sweeper.
(C) No sweeper is cleaner.
(D) Some janitors are not cleaner.
(E) Some sweepers are not janitors.
(F) Some cleaners are janitors.
Statement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of indigenous crude oil.
Conclusions:
I. Crude oil must be imported.
II. Domestic demand should be reduced
In the question, a few statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusion(s) and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
- All rackets are jackets.
- No cow is cat.
- Only cats are dogs.
Conclusions:
- Some rackets are not cats.
- Some cats are jackets.
- Some rackets are cats.
- No dog is a cow.
The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- Some buses are trucks.
- Some trucks are boats.
- No boat is a jeep.
Conclusions
- Some jeeps are buses.
- Some boats are buses.
- Some jeeps are trucks.
In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
- All stars are planets.
- All planets are galaxies.
conclusions
- All galaxies are planets.
- All stars are galaxies.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some Conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
- No statue is an icon
- Some busts are statues
Conclusions:
- No icon is bust
- All busts are icons
In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Statements:
- All rods are sticks.
- No stick ls a pole.
Conclusion:
- All poles being rods is a possibility.
- Some sticks are not rods.
