Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some vegetables are fruits.
II. No fruit is black.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are vegetables.
II. No vegetable is black.
पर्याय
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
उत्तर
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The questions below have two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
I. No athletes are vegetarians.
II. All players are athletes.
II. Therefore, ________________
Statement: The percentage of the national income shared by the top 10 percent of households in India is 35.
Conclusions:
I. When an economy grows fast, concentration of wealth in certain pockets of population takes place.
II. The national income is unevenly distributed in India.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Some A are B.
- Some C are A.
Conclusions:
- Some C are B.
- Some B are A
Statement: The manager humiliated Sachin in the presence of his colleagues.
Conclusions:
I. The manager did not like Sachin.
II. Sachin was not popular with his colleagues.
Statement: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.
Conclusions:
I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.
II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
In the question, a few statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusion(s) and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
- All mirrors are phones.
- Some phones are gadgets.
- All gadgets are mirrors.
Conclusions:
- Some gadgets are phones.
- Some gadgets are mirrors.
- Some gadgets are not mirrors.
- Some phones are mirrors.
Two statements are given below followed by two conclusions (I and II). You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the conclusions if any follow from the given statements.
Statements:
Some books are magazines.
some magazines are novels.
Conclusions:
I. Some books are novels.
II. Some novels are magazines.
The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All calculators are boxes.
- All boxes are taps.
- Some taps are machines.
Conclusions
- Some machines are boxes.
- Some taps are calculators.
- Some boxes are calculators.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. All envelopes are rectangles. All rectangles are rectangular. All envelopes are rectangular.
Argument 2. Some thin are smart. Some smart things are tiny. Some thin are tiny.
Argument 3. Learned are well read. Well read know. Learned know.
Argument 4. Dieting is good for health. Health foods are rare. Dieting is rare.
In the question below are two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts?
Statements:
- All rods are sticks.
- No stick ls a pole.
Conclusion:
- All poles being rods is a possibility.
- Some sticks are not rods.
