Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some players are singers.
II. All singers are tall.
Conclusions:
I. Some players are tall.
II. All players are tall.
Options
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
Solution
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Statement: The percentage of the national income shared by the top 10 percent of households in India is 35.
Conclusions:
I. When an economy grows fast, concentration of wealth in certain pockets of population takes place.
II. The national income is unevenly distributed in India.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Some cats are animals.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are plants.
Conclusions:
- Some cats are plants.
- All plants are animals.
- All animals are cats.
- All plants are cats.
Six statements are given. Below them sets of three statements are given. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two statements to be correct.
(A) Some cleaners are janitors.
(B) All cleaners are sweeper.
(C) No sweeper is cleaner.
(D) Some janitors are not cleaner.
(E) Some sweepers are not janitors.
(F) Some cleaners are janitors.
Statement: Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers.
Conclusions:
I. Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised.
II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV. on the readership of newspapers.
Four arguments are given. Each is a set of three sentences. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two to be correct.
I. God is human. Some humans are fragile. God is fragile.
II. Some MBA is employed. All employed are aliens. Some MBA is aliens.
III. All jacks are spades. Some kings are diamonds. Some kings are spades.
IV. All humans are fragile. God is not human. God is not fragile.
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set in which the combinations are logically related.
(1) Some buildings are not skyscrapers.
(2) Some skyscrapers are not buildings.
(3) No structure is a skyscraper.
(4) All skyscrapers are structures.
(5) Some skyscrapers are buildings.
(6) Some structures are not buildings.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All stars are planets.
- All planets are galaxies.
Conclusions
- All galaxies are planets.
- All stars are galaxies.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All windows are doors.
- All entrances are windows.
- No gate is a door.
Conclusions
- At least some windows are gates.
- No gate is an entrance.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. Some bikes are mopeds. All mopeds are scooters. Some bikes are scooters.
Argument 2. All children are hairs. No hairs are red. No children are red.
Argument 3. No pencil is a pen. Some pens are markers. Some pencils are markers.
Argument 4. Every man has a wife. All wives are devoted. No devoted has a husband.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. No moon is red. All-stars are the moon. All stars are red.
Argument 2. All doors are open. No open is outdoors. All doors are not outdoors.
Argument 3. No Japanese can fire. All Chinese are books. Japanese and Chinese can fight.
Argument 4. No A is B. No B is C. No A is C.
