Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some players are singers.
II. All singers are tall.
Conclusions:
I. Some players are tall.
II. All players are tall.
Options
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
Advertisements
Solution
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Read the information given and answer the question that follows.
Statement: Of all the television sets manufactured in India, the ‘Solar’ brand has the largest sale in India
Conclusions:
- The volume of sales of all the brands of television sets manufactured in India is known.
- The production of no other television set in India is as large as that of ‘Solar’.
Statement: No country is absolutely self-dependent these days.
Conclusions:
I. It is impossible to grow and produce all that a country needs.
II. Countrymen, in general, have become lazy.
Statement: This book 'Z' is the only book that focuses its attention on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980.
Conclusions:
I. There was no question of poverty before 1950.
II. No other book deals with poverty in India during 1950 to 1980.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- Some A are B.
- Some C are A.
Conclusions:
- Some C are B.
- Some B are A
Statement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of indigenous crude oil.
Conclusions:
I. Crude oil must be imported.
II. Domestic demand should be reduced
Statement: The Prime Minister emphatically stated that his government will make every possible effort for the upliftment of poor farmers and farmhands.
Conclusions:
I. Except poor farmers and farmhands, all others have got benefits of fruits of development.
II. No serious efforts have been made in the past for upliftment of any section of the society.
In the question, a few statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusion(s) and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
- All rackets are jackets.
- No cow is cat.
- Only cats are dogs.
Conclusions:
- Some rackets are not cats.
- Some cats are jackets.
- Some rackets are cats.
- No dog is a cow.
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All windows are doors.
- No door is a wall.
Conclusions
- No window is a wall.
- No wall is a door.
Two statements are given, following by two conclusions numbered I and II . Assuming the statements to be true , even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: All trees are plants. Some plants are climbers.
Conclusions:
- Some plants are trees.
- Some trees are climbers.
Three statements are given, following by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements: Some advocates are doctors. Some doctors are players. All players are engineers.
Conclusions:
- Some players are doctors.
- Some engineers are advocates.
- All advocates are engineers.
- Some engineers are doctors.
