Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
Which of the following is wrong?
Options
A will be to the immediate right of C
D will be to the immediate left of B
E will be to the immediate right of A
F will be to the immediate left of D
Advertisements
Solution
E will be to the immediate right of A
Explanation:
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two.
Statements:
1. Some students love reading.
2. Some adults do not love reading.
3. Some students are not adults.
4. Some students are adults.
5. No reading lover is an adult.
6. Some men do not love reading.
The set of statements is:
Paw : Cat :: Hoof : ?
Solve the following question and mark the most appropriate option.
In a family of six, there are three men A, B, and C, and three women R, S, and T. The six persons are Architect, Lawyer, CA, Professor, Doctor, and an Engineer by profession but not in the same order. There are two married couples and two unmarried persons. C is not R's husband. The Doctor is married to a Lawyer. R's grandfather is a Professor. Bis neither A's son nor he is an Architect or a Professor. The Lawyer is T's daughter-in-law. C is T's son and the Engineer's father. A is married to the CA.
Which among the following is the correct pair of married couples?
How many hexagon (six sided figures) can you find here?
Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question above that passage.
Most people feel that they are being confused by the information from the broadcast news. This could be the effect of the information's being delivered too quickly or of its being poorly organized. Analysis of the information content of a typical broadcast news story shows that news stories are far lower in information density than the maximum information density with which most people can cope at any one point of time. So, the information in typical broadcast news stories is poorly organised.
Which one of the following is an assumption that the argument requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
Read the following case and answer the question.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as too author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen to visit a family counsellor.
Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate to a long term solution?
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the factories in the cities be shifted to the outskirts, far away from the main city?
Arguments
- Yes, this is an essential Step for controlling pollution in the city.
- No, such a Step will lead to a lot of inconveniences to the employees of the factories and their families as well.
The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
Statement Many species of animals on our earth are still not studied scientifically and if we do not do this work urgently, many species will face extinction.
Assumptions
- Earth may lose all types of life very shortly.
- It is desirable and possible to study scientifically many animal species.
In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement
- The majority of Indian labourers belong to the unorganised sector and most of them earn very low.
Conclusions
- The labourers belonging to the organised sector have better benefits and stability.
- Some labourers belonging to the unorganised sector have a regular and certain income.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
- Should there be a limit on drawing groundwater for irrigation purposes in India?
Arguments
- No, irrigation is of prime importance for food production in India and it is heavily dependent on groundwater in many parts of the country.
- Yes, water tables have gone down to alarmingly low levels in some parts of the country where irrigation is primarily dependent on groundwater, which may lead to serious environmental consequences.
- Yes, India just cannot afford to draw groundwater any further as the international agencies have cautioned India against it.
