English

All Men Are Chairs. John Doe is a Man. in Logical Language, Therefore:

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore: 

Options

  • John Doe is a chair 

  • John Doe is a human being and therefore he cannot be a chair 

  • A man cannot be a chair in any case 

  • Chairs can be men 

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

John Doe is a chair 

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Geeta is taller than Seeta, but not taller than Radha. Radha and Rani are of same height. Geeta is shorter than Paru. Amongst all girls who is the shortest?


The words in the bottom row are related in the same way as the words in the top row. Fill in the blank. 

If Ocean: Waves, then Desert: —————— 


Choose the most appropriate option:

If Oceans are Deserts, then Waves are:


The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.

Statements:

  1. Some men are of short- height.
  2. Short-heighted men are intelligent.
  3. Sudhir is a man.
  4. Sudhir is of short-height.
  5. Sudhir is intelligent.
  6. AII men are intelligent.

In the following questions find which one word cannot be formed from the letters of the given words using each letter only once:

IMPACTIENCE


South : North-West :: West : ?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.

Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.

If a mediator breaches his client's confidence about a serious issue without first informing their client of their intentions, they are breaking the law.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement 

  • Should there be only a uniform rate of income tax irrespective of the level of income?

Arguments

  1. Yes, this will substantially reduce the work of the officials of the income tax department. 
  2. No, this will reduce government tax collection to a large extent.


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the questions that follow each passage.

With social media emerging as one of the most popular hangouts for Indians, brand endorsement deals in the country are getting hugely influenced by how active celebrities are on Twitter, Facebook Instagram, and blogs.

Which of the following substantially weakens the argument given in the above statement?


The question has a main statement, followed by four statements labeled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logical with the main statement.

Every player will become a champ.

  1. Rajesh is a player.
  2. Rajesh will become champ.
  3. Rajesh is not a player.
  4. Rajesh will not become a champ.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×