Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore:
विकल्प
John Doe is a chair
John Doe is a human being and therefore he cannot be a chair
A man cannot be a chair in any case
Chairs can be men
Advertisements
उत्तर
John Doe is a chair
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Find the odd one out :
Heart, Lungs, Kidney, Skin, Liver
Read the following information carefully and choose the appropriate option in the questions given below:
i. There is a group of five persons – A, B, C, D and E.
ii. One of them is a Singer, one is a Dancer, one is a Painter, one is a teacher and one is a Doctor.
iii. Three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice.
iv. The Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice.
v. The Singer is C’s brother.
Who is a Dancer?
Read the information given below and answer the question that follows.
The faces of a cube are painted in different colors. Blackface is opposite to red. Whiteface is between black and red. Green face is adjacent to grey and blue face is adjacent to green. What colour will be on the face opposite to the white face of the cube?
Microphone : Loud :: Microscope : ?
The main statement is followed by four sentences. Select a pair of sentences that relate logically to the given statement.
If you go to China, You can find Chinese toys
- I didn't find Chinese toys.
- I found Chinese toys.
- I went to the fair.
- I didn't go to China.
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the factories in the cities be shifted to the outskirts, far away from the main city?
Arguments
- Yes, this is an essential Step for controlling pollution in the city.
- No, such a Step will lead to a lot of inconveniences to the employees of the factories and their families as well.
The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
Statement As poor people in India prefer and use jaggery rather than sugar, the government has decided to decontrol and scrap sugar distribution through the Public Distribution System (PDS).
Assumptions
- Jaggery is freely available at a reasonable price to all poor people.
- PDS has lost its utility.
Some people fear that our first extra-terrestrial visitors will not be the friendly aliens envisaged in popular science fiction movies, but rather hostile invaders bent on global domination. This fear is groundless. Any alien civilization that makes it to our planet must have acquired the wisdom to control war, or it would have destroyed itself long before contacting us.
The author bases the argument above on which of the following assumptions?
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
- Should the salary and perquisites of public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?
Arguments
- Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
- No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
- Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.
