Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
'All men are mortal and Victoria is a woman and hence Victoria is mortal‘. This statement is:
विकल्प
Logically Valid
Logically Invalid
Logically True
Logically False
Advertisements
उत्तर
Logically Invalid
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
H will be sitting between:
If it is true that 'Religious fundamentalism is dangerous to the society', then which one of the following statements can also be true?
The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.
- X and Y are siblings.
- X and Y do not quarrel.
- Siblings are known to quarrel often.
- X and Y quarrel often.
- All those who quarrel are siblings.
- X and Y cannot be siblings.
Find the odd one out from the following:
Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.
wave: crest as _________ : peak.
Architect : Building :: Sculptor : ?
Carbon : Diamond :: Corundum : ?
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should English be the medium of instruction for higher education in India?
Arguments
- Yes, even in advanced countries like the UK and the USA, the medium of instruction is English for higher education.
- Yes, English is a much widely spoken language in the world today.
A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard's skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards?
For the same reason, I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Science has brought gadgets of happiness, prosperity, and wealth.
- Science has not solved the problems of overpopulation.
Conclusions
- Overpopulation is due to unscientific thinking.
- Science has not helped world peace.
