Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore:
पर्याय
John Doe is a chair
John Doe is a human being and therefore he cannot be a chair
A man cannot be a chair in any case
Chairs can be men
Advertisements
उत्तर
John Doe is a chair
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good in driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at driving the motor Cycle, Jeep and Lorry but not a bus?
Answer the question based on the information given.
A highly cohesive workgroup is a prerequisite for high team performance. Sociologists point out that the association between group cohesion and success is owing to the support individual team members give to one another and their acceptance of the group's goals and activities.
Each of the following, if true, either provides support for or cannot weaken the sociologists' assumption about the relationship between cohesion and success EXCEPT
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
A and B are good at driving bus and car. C and A are good at driving car and scooter. C, D and E are good at driving scooter and tractor. E and C are good at driving scooter and auto rickshaw. D and B are good at driving bus and tractor.
Who is good at driving scooter, tractor and bus?
If ‘DECEMBER’ is ‘AUGUST’, 'MARCH’ is ‘MAY’, ‘SEPTEMBER’ is ‘SEPTEMBER’ and ‘OCTOBER’ is ‘JULY’, then ‘JUNE’ is?
Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?
A large volume of water is gushing through a pipe which narrows at the outlet. At which point, A, B, C or D will the water flow fastest?
The question has a main statement followed by four statements labelled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Every player will become a champ.
A. Rajesh is a player.
B. Rajesh will become champ.
C. Rajesh is not a player.
D. Rajesh will not become a champ.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, Ill, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should people with educational qualifications higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?
Arguments
- No, it will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
- Yes, it creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
- No, this goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
- Yes, this will increase productivity.
Examine the following statements
- None but the rich can afford to travel by air.
- Some of those who travel by air become sick.
- Some of those who become sick require treatment.
Which one of the following conclusions can be drawn from the above statements?
In the following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and m. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements.
Statements
- Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
- This is the 64 number bus.
Conclusions
- This bus goes to my office.
- This bus does not go to my office.
