English

A 2100 Member Team Consisting of Team Leaders and Athletes is Attending a National Athletic Meet. - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Choose the most appropriate option:

A 2100 member team consisting of Team Leaders and Athletes is attending a National Athletic Meet. For every 20 Athletes, there is one Team Leader. How many Team Leaders would be there in the team?

Options

  • 105

  • 110

  • 95

  • 100

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

100

Explanation:

Let the member of team leaders be z therefore,  
the  member of atheletes = 20z  
then, z + 20z = 2100  
z = 100

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. 

(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.      
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D. 

A and F will become neighbours if: 


Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two. 

Statements:

1. Some students love reading.
2. Some adults do not love reading.
3. Some students are not adults.
4. Some students are adults.
5. No reading lover is an adult.
6. Some men do not love reading.  

The set of statements is: 


Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.

What is meant by ‘Alliteration’?


Direction: Read the information below and answer the question.

A neurosurgeon, an orthopaedist, a plastic surgeon, and an ophthalmologist visited the patient after surgery.

The time of each visit is mentioned below:
Neurosurgeon at 7:45
Orthopaedist 8:30
Plastic surgeon 9:15
Ophthalmologist 9:50

Each time mentioned above may be either A.M. or P.M.

Who were the doctors to visit the patient in the evening?


Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy was about providing opportunities to a lot more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision to not select players from the previous World Cup to the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad. 

Which of the following is the most desirable outcome of Dravid’s selection strategy from his perspective? 


Cloth : Mill :: Newspaper : ?


The main statement is followed by four sentences. Select a pair of sentences that relate logically to the given statement.
If you go to China, You can find Chinese toys

  1. I didn't find Chinese toys.
  2. I found Chinese toys.
  3. I went to the fair.
  4. I didn't go to China.

Read the following case and answer the question.

Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as too author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife. 

Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above

I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen to visit a family counsellor.

Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate to a long term solution?


In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?

Arguments

  1. No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
  2. No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
  3. Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
  4. Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.

A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard's skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards?
For the same reason, I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×