Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Choose the most appropriate option:
A 2100 member team consisting of Team Leaders and Athletes is attending a National Athletic Meet. For every 20 Athletes, there is one Team Leader. How many Team Leaders would be there in the team?
Options
105
110
95
100
Advertisements
Solution
100
Explanation:
Let the member of team leaders be z therefore,
the member of atheletes = 20z
then, z + 20z = 2100
z = 100
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two.
Statements:
1. All human beings need education.
2. All teachers need training.
3. Education is provided by the teachers.
4. X is a teacher.
5. X needs training.
6. Students are future of a nation.
The set of statements is:
Find the odd one out from the following:
Find the odd one out
CUP : LIP :: BIRD : ?
Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?
How many hexagon (six sided figures) can you find here?
Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs -Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:
- Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
- Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
- Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
- Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
- Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
- Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.
Which one of the following could be an accurate matching of film buffs to films?
Read the following case and answer the question.
Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as to author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife.
Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above
I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen visit a family counsellor.
Which of the following statements, if true would weaken the decision to sack Kishen the most?
In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, III, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should all the management institutes in the country be brought under government control?
Arguments
- No, the government does not have adequate resources to run such institutes effectively.
- No, each institute should be given the freedom to function on its own.
- Yes, this will enable to have standarised education for all the students.
- Yes, only then the quality of education would be improved.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III.
You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Most of the 64 number of buses go to my office.
- This is the 64 number bus.
Conclusions
- This bus goes to my office.
- This bus does not go to my office.
