Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Which of the following is NOT the property of equipotential surface?
पर्याय
They do not cross each other.
The rate of change of potential with distance on them is zero.
For a uniform electric field, they are concentric spheres.
They can be imaginary spheres.
The work done in carrying a charge from one point to another on an equipotential surface is zero.
Advertisements
उत्तर
For a uniform electric field, they are concentric spheres.
Explanation:
As all other statements are correct. In a uniform electric field, equipotential surfaces are never concentric spheres but are planes ⊥ to Electric field lines.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
A man fixes outside his house one evening a two metre high insulating slab carrying on its top a large aluminium sheet of area 1 m2. Will he get an electric shock if he touches the metal sheet next morning?
Find the amount of work done in rotating an electric dipole of dipole moment 3.2 x 10- 8Cm from its position of stable equilibrium to the position of unstable equilibrium in a uniform electric field if intensity 104 N/C.
Statement - 1: For practical purpose, the earth is used as a reference at zero potential in electrical circuits.
Statement - 2: The electrical potential of a sphere of radius R with charge Q uniformly distributed on the surface is given by `Q/(4piepsilon_0R)`.
Consider the following statements and select the correct statement(s).
- Electric field lines are always perpendicular to equipotential surface.
- No two equipotential surfaces can intersect each other.
- Electric field lines are in the direction of tangent to an equipotential surface.
The work done to move a charge along an equipotential from A to B ______.
- cannot be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
- must be defined as `- int_A^B E.dl`
- is zero.
- can have a non-zero value.
What is meant by an equipotential surface?
A curve connecting points that all have equal electric potential is best described as:
In the derivation proving \[\vec{E}\] is perpendicular to an equipotential surface, a charge \[q_0\] undergoes a small displacement \[d\vec{l}\] along the surface, with \[\vec{E}\] making an angle \[\theta\] with the displacement. Equating the work expressions leads to which conclusion?
The relation between the electric field \[\vec{E}\] and the potential gradient is expressed as:
A particle floats between two parallel plates separated by 0.1 m with a potential difference of 4000 V. The particle carries a charge of \[1.6 \times 10^{-19}\] C. Taking \[g = 9.8\ \text{m/s}^2\], the mass of the particle is approximately:
