मराठी

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow: Bassanio:  And, beseech you, Wrest once the law to your authority. Who is on trial? Why is this person on trial? - English 2 (Literature in English)

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow:

Bassanio: 
And, I beseech you,
Wrest once the law to your authority.
To do a great right, do a little wrong,
and curb this cruel devil of his will.

Portia: 
It must not be. There is no power in Venice
Can alter a decree established:
“I will be recorded for a precedent,

  1. Who is on trial?
    Why is this person on trial?     [3]
  2. Explain in your own words Bassanio’s request to portia in the given extract.
    What reason does he give for his request?    [3]
  3. How does Portia respond to Bassanio's request? What TWO reasons does she give for her response?   [3]
  4. Who does Bassanio refer to as ‘this cruel devil’? What is this person's response to Portia’s words in the given extract?   [3]
  5. How is the ‘cruel devil’ punished at the end of the trial?
    How fair, in your opinion, is this punishment? Justify your response.   [4]
दीर्घउत्तर
Advertisements

उत्तर

  1. The person on trial in this extract from William Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice" is Antonio.
    Antonio is on trial because he failed to repay a loan he had secured from Shylock, a Jewish moneylender. In their agreement, Shylock stipulated a harsh penalty in case of default: Antonio would have to give Shylock a pound of his own flesh. Because Antonio was unable to fulfill the terms of the bond, due to his ships, believed to be lost at sea, not returning with goods and profits, Shylock demands that the terms of the bond be enforced, leading to this trial to determine whether Shylock is legally entitled to claim his gruesome repayment.
  2. In the extract from "The Merchant of Venice," Bassanio is appealing to Portia, who is disguised as a lawyer, to bend the law slightly in order to achieve a greater moral good. His plea, "To do a great right, do a little wrong," suggests that he is asking Portia to slightly overstep the strict boundaries of the law to prevent a grave injustice, which in this context is allowing Shylock to take a pound of Antonio's flesh as per their bond.

    Reason for Bassanio's request: Bassanio's reason for this request is his desperate desire to save his friend Antonio from a lethal penalty. He argues that the law, while technically on Shylock's side, morally supports Antonio. Thus, he believes that committing a small legal wrong (altering the enforcement of the law) would serve a greater justice by saving Antonio’s life and curbing Shylock’s malicious intent, whom he refers to as "this cruel devil of his will." This reflects the tension in the play between rigid adherence to the law and the need for compassionate justice.

  3. In the given extract from "The Merchant of Venice," Portia responds to Bassanio's plea by firmly stating that it is not possible to alter the law to fit their needs. Her response is clear and unequivocal: the law cannot be twisted or bent, even for a seemingly good cause.

    Two reasons Portia gives for her response:

    1. Legal Integrity: Portia asserts that there is no power in Venice that can change a decree once it has been established. This emphasizes the importance of the rule of law and the integrity of the legal system, which must remain consistent and unaltered to maintain its authority and fairness.

    2. Precedent: Portia mentions that any deviation from the law would be recorded as a precedent. This highlights her concern about the long-term consequences of bending the law. If they make an exception in this case, it could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to future abuses of legal authority where the law could be similarly manipulated for personal or emotional reasons.
      Together, these reasons underline Portia's commitment to upholding the law as it is written, emphasizing the principles of justice and legal consistency over emotional appeals, even in situations where the outcome may seem morally harsh.

  4. In the given extract from "The Merchant of Venice," Bassanio refers to Shylock as "this cruel devil." He uses this phrase to express his view of Shylock's harsh and unforgiving insistence on claiming a pound of Antonio's flesh as repayment for the defaulted loan, which Bassanio sees as malevolent and merciless.

    As for the response to Portia’s words in this specific extract, the response of Shylock is not included. However, throughout the trial scene, Shylock consistently asserts his rights under the bond and demands the law be followed to the letter, showing no willingness to compromise or show mercy. His stance is rigid and unyielding, focused solely on obtaining what he believes is legally his due, regardless of the moral implications or the potential for human suffering it entails.

  5. In "The Merchant of Venice," the 'cruel devil' that Bassanio refers to is Shylock, the Jewish moneylender. By the end of the trial, Shylock is subjected to significant punishment:

      1. Forfeiture of Wealth: Initially, Shylock insists on extracting a pound of flesh from Antonio as per their bond, but Portia, disguised as the young lawyer Balthazar, turns the law against him. She points out that while the bond allows Shylock to remove the flesh, it does not permit him to shed any of Antonio's blood. Realizing that it is impossible to take the flesh without shedding blood, Shylock attempts to settle for the repayment of the loan instead. However, Portia further reveals that Shylock has attempted to take the life of a Venetian citizen, which under Venetian law allows the state to confiscate half of Shylock’s wealth, giving it to Antonio, and the other half to the state.
      2. Conversion Requirement: Moreover, as part of his punishment and as a condition of not losing his entire wealth and facing execution, Shylock is forced to convert to Christianity, a deeply humiliating and identity-stripping requirement for him, given his strong adherence to his Jewish faith.
      3. Legal Perspective: From a strictly legal standpoint, the punishment adheres to the laws of Venice, which protect its citizens and prescribe penalties for those who threaten their lives. Shylock, by insisting on a literal interpretation of the bond, puts himself at risk of these laws.
      4. Moral and Ethical Perspective: Morally and ethically, the punishment can be seen as harsh and excessive. Forcing Shylock to convert to Christianity is particularly severe, as it directly assaults his identity and dignity. This aspect of his punishment reflects the religious prejudices of the time and is arguably unfair and inhumane, showing a lack of respect for personal beliefs and religious freedom.
      5. Thematic Perspective: Thematically, the punishment serves to underscore themes of mercy, justice, and revenge within the play. Shakespeare may be using these outcomes to highlight the dangers of both mercy that is too rigid (Shylock's refusal to forgive the debt) and justice that turns into vengeance (the Christians’ treatment of Shylock).
shaalaa.com
Reading
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2023-2024 (March) Official

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

 Answer the following with reference to the story.

“Sure they had a teacher, but it wasn’t a regular teacher. It was a man.”

  1. Who does ‘they’ refer to?
  2.  What does ‘regular’ mean here?
  3. What is it contrasted with?

Thinking about the Text
Answer these question.

You’ll soon stop being smart.”
(i) Who says this?
(ii) Why does the speaker say it?
(iii) What according to the speaker will stop Gerrard from being smart?


Thinking about Poem

What is the meaning of “bleeding bark”? What makes it bleed?


1. I first met Private Quelch at the training depot. A man is liable to acquire in his firs week of Army life - together with his uniform, rifle and equipment- a nickname. Anyone who saw Private Quelch, lanky, stooping, frowning through horn-rimmed spectacles, understood why he was known as the Professor. Those who had any doubts on the subject lost them after five minutes' conversation with him.
2. I remember the first lesson we had in musketry. We stood in an attentive circle while a Sergeant, a man as dark and sun-dried as raisins, wearing North-West Frontier ribbons, described the mechanism of a service rifle.
3. "The muzzle velocity or speed at which the bullet leaves the rifle", he told us, "is
well over two thousand feet per second."
4. A voice interrupted. "Two thousand, four hundred and forty feet per second." It
was the Professor.
5. "That's right," the Sergeant said without enthusiasm, and went on lecturing. When he had finished, he asked us questions; and, perhaps in the hope of revenge, he turned with his questions again and again to the Professor. The only result was to enhance the Professor's glory. Technical definitions, the parts of a rifle, its use and care, he had them all by heart.
6. The Sergeant asked, "Have you had any training before?"
7. The Professor answered with a phrase that was to become familiar to all of us. "No, Sergeant. It's all a matter of intelligent reading."
8. That was our introduction to him. We soon learned more about him. He saw to that. He meant to get on, he told us. He had the brains. He was sure to get a commission, before long. As a first step, he meant to get a stripe.
9. In pursuit of his ambition he worked hard. We had to give him credit for that. He borrowed training manuals and stayed up late at nights reading them. He badgered the instructors with questions. He drilled with enthusiasm, and on route marches he was not only miraculously tireless but infuriated us all with his horrible heartiness. "What about a song, chaps?" is not greeted politely at the end of thirty miles. His salute at the pay table was a model to behold. When officers were in sight he would swing his skinny arms and march to the canteen like a Guardsman.
10. And day in and day out, he lectured to us in his droning, remorseless voice on every aspect of human knowledge. At first we had a certain respect for him, but soon we lived in terror of his approach. We tried to hit back at him with clumsy sarcasms and practical jokes. The Professor scarcely noticed; he was too busy working for his stripe.
11. Each time one of us made a mistake the Professor would publicly correct him. Whenever one of us shone, the Professor outshone him. When, after a hard morning's work of cleaning out our hut, we listened in silence to the Orderly Officer's praise, the Professor would break out with a ringing, dutifully beaming, "Thank you, sir!" And how superior, how condescending he was. It was always,
"Let me show you, fellow," or, "No, you'll ruin your rifle that way, old man."
12. We used to pride ourselves on aircraft recognition. Once, out for a walk, we heard the drone of a plane flying high overhead. None of us could even see it in the glare of the sun. Without even a glance upward the Professor announced, "That, of course, is a North American Harvard Trainer. It can be unmistakably identified by the harsh engine note, due to the high tip speed of the airscrew."
What could a gang of louts like us do with a man like that? 13. None of us will ever forget the
drowsy summer afternoon which was such a turning-point in the Professor's life.
14. We were sprawling contentedly on the warm grass while Corporal Turnbull was taking a lesson on the hand grenade.
15. Corporal Turnbull was a young man, but he was not a man to be trifled with. He had come back from Dunkirk with all his equipment correct and accounted for and his kitten in his pocket. He was
our hero, and we used to tell each other that he was so tough that you could hammer nails into him without his noticing it.
16. _"The outside of a grenade, as you can see," Corporal Turnbull was saying, "is divided up into a large number of fragments to assist segmentation"
17. "Forty-four"
18. "What's that?" The Corporal looked over his shoulder
19. "Forty-four segments." The Professor beamed at him.
20. The Corporal said nothing, but his brow tightened. He opened his mouth to
resume.
21. "And by the way, Corporal." We were all thunder-struck.
22. The Professor was speaking again. "Shouldn't you have started off with the five characteristics of the grenade? Our instructor at the other camp always used to do that, you know."
23. In the silence that followed a dark flush stained the tan of the Corporal's face. "Here," he said at last, "you give this lecture". As if afraid to say any more, he tossed the grenade to the Professor. Quite unabashed, Private Quelch climbed to his feet and with the attitude of a man coming into his birth-right gave us an unexceptionable lecture on the grenade.
24. The squad listened in a cowed, horrified kind of silence. Corporal Turnbull stood and watched, impassive, except for a searching intentness of gaze. When the lecture was finished he said, "Thank you, Private Quelch. Fall in with the others now." He did not speak again until we had fallen in and were waiting to be dismissed. Then he addressed us. 25. "As some of you may have heard," he began deliberately, "the platoon officer has  asked me to nominate one of you for…." He paused and looked lingeringly up and down the ranks as if seeking final confirmation of decision.
26. So this was the great moment! Most of us could not help glancing at Private Quelch, who stood rigidly to attention and stared straight in front of him with an expression of self-conscious innocence.
27. ______"…..for permanent cookhouse duties, I've decided that Private Quelch is just the man for the job."
28. Of course, it was a joke for days afterwards; a joke and joy to all of us.
29. I remember, though.............
30. My friend Trower and I were talking about it a few days later. We were returning from the canteen to our own hut.
31. Through the open door, we could see the three cooks standing against the wall as if at bay; and from within came the monotonous beat of a familiar voice.
32. "Really. I must protest against this abominably unscientific and unhygienic method of peeling potatoes. I need to only draw your attention to the sheer waste of vitamin values.............."
33. We fled.
About the Author
Alexander Baron (1917-1999) has written many novels, including 'There's no Home',
' The Human Kind', 'Queen of the East', 'Seeing Life' and The How Life', along with
film scripts and television plays. He started life as an Asstt. Editor of The Tribune and
later edited the 'New Theater.' He served in the army during the Second World War.


“He had the distinction of being the only member of the party to have bagged any game...”The phrase in underlined means

Mark the right answer.


(i) What makes Mridu conclude that the beggar has no money to buy chappals?

(ii) What does she suggest to show her concern?


Why did Soapy not like to go to his known persons?


Who hides behind the trees in “Hide and Seek.”


Answer the following question.
What was Algu’s verdict as head Panch? How did Jumman take it?


How does Prospero ask to be to be released from his “bands” in the Epilogue of the play, The Tempest?


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×