English

Who is a Singer?

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Read the following information carefully and choose the appropriate option in the questions given below:

i. There is a group of five persons – A, B, C, D and E.

ii. One of them is a Singer, one is a Dancer, one is a Painter, one is a teacher and one is a Doctor.

iii. Three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice.

iv. The Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice.

v. The Singer is C’s brother.

Who is a Singer?

Options

  • B

  • C

  • A

  • D

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

A

Explanation:

The arrangement of five persons is as following:

Person Profession Preference
A Singer Rice to Chapatti
B Teacher Chapatti to rice
C Dancer Rice ti Chapati
D Painter Chapatti to Rice
E Doctor Rice to Chapatti

A is a Singer.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2016-2017 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements. 

(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.      
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D. 

H will be sitting between: 


If it is false that 'Men always pray to God', then which one of the following statements is true?


Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?


Master : OCUVGT :: LABOUR : ?


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question below that  passage.
Arbitrator: The shipping manager admits that he decided to close the old facility on October 14 and to schedule the new facility's opening for October 17, the following Monday. But he also claims that he is not responsible for the business that was lost due to the new facility's failing to open as scheduled. He blames the contractor for not finishing on time, but he too, is to blame, for he was aware of the contractor's typical delays and should have planned for this contingency.

Which one of the following principles underlies the arbitrator's argument?


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the question below that passage.
Anita:
Television programs and movies that depict violence among teenagers are extremely popular. Given how influential these media are, we have good reason to believe that these depictions cause young people to engage in violent behaviour. Hence, depictions of violence among teenagers should be prohibited from movies and television programs.
Amrita: But you are recommending nothing short of censorship! Besides which, your claim that television and movie depictions of violence causes violence is mistaken: violence among young people predates movies and television by centuries.
Amrita's attempted refutation of Anita's argument is vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?


Read the following case and answer the question.

Sakshi is the Vice-President in an electrical equipment company in Delhi. One day, her subordinate Bhaskar requested that Kishen, a project manager, be transferred to the Mumbai office from the Delhi office. In Mumbai, Kishen would work alone as a researcher. Bhaskar gave the following reasons for his request "Kishen is known for fighting frequently with colleagues of his team. He cannot accept criticism and feels rejected and get hostile. He is overbearing and is generally a bad influence on the team. Sakshi called upon Samir, another project manager and sought further information on Kishen. Samir recalled that a former colleague, Lalit (who was also Kishen's former boss) has made few remarks on Kishen in his appraisal report. In his opinion, Kishen was not fit for further promotion as he was emotionally unstable to work in groups in spite of the fact that he had seven years of work experience. Lalit has described Kishen as too author it alive to work under anyone. Lalit has further told Samir that Kishen had an ailing wife and an old mother, who does not want to stay with his wife. 

Consider the following solutions to the problem mentioned above

I. Sakshi should transfer Kishen to Mumbai office.
II. Sakshi should try and verify the facts from other sources as well.
III. Kishen should be sacked.
IV. Kishen should be demoted.
V. Sakshi should suggest Kishen to visit a family counsellor.

Which of the following would be the most appropriate sequence of decisions in terms of immediacy starting from immediate to a long term solution?


Read the following short passage and choose the best answer to the questions following the passage.

Columnist: Senators who are not firmly committed to a core set of beliefs will formulate new campaign strategies and moot points before each upcoming election. Senators are elected to serve multiple terms in office only if they formulate new campaign strategies and moot points before each upcoming election. Therefore, senators who are not firmly committed to a core set of beliefs are elected to serve multiple terms in office.   

Which one of the following displays a flawed pattern of reasoning most closely parallel to that in the columnist's argument? 


In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should coal engines be replaced by electric engines in trains?

Arguments

  1. Yes, coal engines cause a lot of pollution.
  2. No, India does not produce enough electricity to fulfill even the domestic needs.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by four arguments numbered I, II, Ill, and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should people with educational qualifications higher than the optimum requirements be debarred from seeking jobs?

Arguments

  1. No, it will further aggravate the problem of educated unemployment.
  2. Yes, it creates complexes among employees and affects the work adversely.
  3. No, this goes against the basic rights of the individuals.
  4. Yes, this will increase productivity.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×