Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Which group among the following options represents the three princely states that resisted their merger with India?
Options
Hyderabad, Bhopal, Jammu and Kashmir
Junagarh, Gwalior, Mysore
Junagarh, Hyderabad, Travancore
Gwalior, Travancore, Bhopal
Advertisements
Solution
Junagarh, Hyderabad, Travancore
Explanation:
The following three princely states opposed joining India:
- Junagarh: First a part of Pakistan, then took by India.
- Hyderabad: Experienced Operation Polo, which resulted in its incorporation into India.
- Travancore: Before consenting to unite with India, it underwent discussions and diplomatic pressure.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Here are two opinions :-
Bismay: “The merger with the Indian State was an extension of democracy to the people of the Princely States."
Inderpreet: “I am not so sure, there was force being used. Democracy comes by creating consensus.”
What is your opinion in the light of accession of Princely States and the responses of the people in these parts?
The First Home Minister of independent India was ____________.
Which state was not created in 2000?
When Meghalaya was carved out of Assam?
Which one of the following is a princely state of India that initially resisted joining the Indian Union?
How many princely states existed at the time of independence of India?
When Gujarat was carved out of Bombay?
The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad. He entered into what was called the standstill agreement with India in November 1947 for ______ while negotiations with the Indian Government were going on.
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was entrusted with the task of the unification of the princely states. Which of the following argument is not correct?
Match the principles with instances:
| (a) | Mapping of boundaries on religious grounds | (i) | Pakistan and Bangladesh |
| (b) | Mapping of boundaries on grounds of different languages | (ii) | India and Pakistan |
| (c) | Demarcating boundaries within a country by geographical zones | (iii) | Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh |
| (d) | Demarcating boundaries within a country on administrative and political grounds | (iv) | Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand |
Indian Government had taken a firm stand to prevent possible division of the country into small principalities after independence. Consider the following statements in this regard-
- Government showed more rigidity towards giving autonomy to these princely states.
- Accession of princely states of Junagarh, Hyderabad, Kashmir, and Manipur ·proved more difficult than the rest
Choose the correct statement-
Who played an important role in the integration of Princely States with India?
Bodhachandra Singh, was maharaja of?
Which of the following states initially refused to join the Indian Union?
A paramilitary force of Nizam of Hyderabad which was sent to respond people's movement was known as ______.
The Maharaja of Manipur at the time of independence was ______.
What do you understand by the 'British paramountcy or suzerainty'?
Evaluate Sardar Patel’s role in the integration of princely states with Indian Union.
