Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
What do you infer from Gardiner’s essay ‘On the rule of the Road'?
Advertisements
Solution
A.G. Gardiner’s essay ‘On the rule of the Road’ is a treatise on “liberty”. He starts the essay with an anecdote. A liberty-drunk Russian lady starts walking down the middle of the Highway frustrating car drivers, bus drivers, and the traffic police. When questioned about her behavior, she just replied that she now has the liberty to walk anywhere she liked. The author observes that if a pedestrian gives up the pavement in preference to the road, cars will be forced to move on to the pavement. This would result in universal chaos. Everybody would be getting in everybody’s way. Nobody would get anywhere. Individual liberty would have become social anarchy.
Under such circumstances, the world is in danger of getting liberty drunk. The rule of the road reminds the readers that in order that liberties of all may be preserved, the liberty of everybody must be curtailed. Thus the traffic police at Piccadilly Circus is not a symbol of tyranny but of liberty. He doesn’t hinder but helps the smooth flow of traffic. One has to allow curtailment of one’s liberty to enjoy the fruits of social order.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Describe the appearance of Nicola and Jacopo.
What message is conveyed through the story ‘Two Gentlemen of Verona’?
How does army tea taste?
Why does the author prefer the cylindrical cup to a flat cup?
Whom does the author call ‘misguided people’? What is his advice to them?
Elucidate the author’s ideas about teapots.
What were Dr. Barnard’s feelings when he was hospitalized after an accident?
Why did the choice of roles prove to be easy for them?
How does Dr. Barnard know the boy who played the trolley’s driver?
Dr. Barnard couldn’t find any nobility in suffering. Why?
Why does Dr. Barnard find suffering of children heartbreaking?
How did a casual incident in a hospital help Dr. Barnard perceive a new dimension of life?
Life is unjust and cruel to certain people. Do they all resign themselves to their fate? Can you think of some who have fought their disabilities heroically and remained a stellar example for others? (for e.g. the astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, a paraplegic). Give an account of one such person and his/her struggle to live a fruitful life.
Adventures, expeditions, and explorations are always exciting. Especially when they are real and if it is the first of its kind, it is even more thrilling. The only question that comes to one’s mind is what makes one to take up such tasks that involve high risks. It is the spirit of formidable adventure and certain qualities which make them achieve such feats.
When did Hillary feel a sense of freedom and well being?
What did Edmund Hillary do to escape the large overhanging ice cornices?
The soft snow was difficult and dangerous. Why?
Describe the stool that the narrator’s family had.
What was grandmother’s suggestion of wood? Why?
When did the children get over the fear of sitting on the chair?
Why did Maamanaar hand over the chair to the villagers to retain it?
What does the ‘rule of the road’ mean?
How would a reasonable person react when his actions affect other person’s liberty?
According to the author, what are we more conscious of?
"My right to swing my fist ends, where your nose begins." Elucidate with reference to, ‘On the Rule of the Road’.
Civilization can only exist when the public collectively accepts constraints on its freedom of action – Explain.
‘There is no height, no depth that the spirit of man, guided by higher Spirit cannot attain’. Discuss the above statement in the context of the achievement of Edmund Hillary and Tenzing.
How responsible and capable are you at home?
