English

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence. [~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
p q r p∨q ~(p∨q) [~(p∨q)∨(p∨q)] [~(p∨q)∨(p∨q)]∧r
T T T T F T T
T T F T F T F
T F T T F T T
T F F T F T F
F T T T F T T
F T F T F T F
F F T F T T T
F F F F T T F

In the above truth table, the entries in columns 3 and 7 are identical.

∴ [~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.14 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

If he studies, then he will go to college.


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.

“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×