English

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence. p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q

Sum
Advertisements

Solution

1 2 3 4 5 6
p q ~p ~p∨q p∧(~p∨q) p∧q
T T F T T T
T F F F F F
F T T T F F
F F T T F F

In the above truth table, the entries in columns 5 and 6 are identical.

∴ p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q

shaalaa.com
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [Page 33]

APPEARS IN

Balbharati Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.14 | Page 33

RELATED QUESTIONS

Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q.


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×