Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Advertisements
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| p | q | ~p | ~p∨q | p∧(~p∨q) | p∧q |
| T | T | F | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | F | F | F |
| F | T | T | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | F | F |
In the above truth table, the entries in columns 5 and 6 are identical.
∴ p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
The false statement in the following is ______.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
