Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Advertisements
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| p | q | r | p∨q | ~(p∨q) | [~(p∨q)∨(p∨q)] | [~(p∨q)∨(p∨q)]∧r |
| T | T | T | T | F | T | T |
| T | T | F | T | F | T | F |
| T | F | T | T | F | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | F |
| F | T | T | T | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | F | T | F |
| F | F | T | F | T | T | T |
| F | F | F | F | T | T | F |
In the above truth table, the entries in columns 3 and 7 are identical.
∴ [~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
