हिंदी

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence. p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)

योग
Advertisements

उत्तर

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
p q r q∨r p∧(q∨r) p∧q p∧r (p∧q)∨(p∧r)
T T T T T T T T
T T F T T T F T
T F T T T F T T
T F F F F F F F
F T T T F F F F
F T F T F F F F
F F T T F F F F
F F F F F F F F

In the above truth table, the entries in columns 5 and 8 are identical.

∴ p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [पृष्ठ ३३]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] Standard 12 Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.14 | पृष्ठ ३३

संबंधित प्रश्न

Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×