Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Advertisements
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p↔q | p∧~q | ~(p∧~q) | (q∧~p) | ~(q∧~p) | ~(p∧~q)∧~(q ∧ ~p) |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | T | F | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | F | F | T | F |
| F | T | T | F | F | F | T | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | T | F | T | F | T | T |
In the above truth table, the entries in columns 5 and 10 are identical.
∴ p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
~(p ∨ q) → r
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
