English

Statement I: the Government, by Legislation Has Decided to Make All Public Information Available to General Public. - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:

In the of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent causes without having any relationship. 

Statement I: The Government, by legislation has decided to make all public information available to general public.
Statement II: Before passing legislation, general public did not have access to public information.

Options

  • Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect

  • Both statements I and II are independent causes.

  • Statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.

  • Both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.

MCQ
Advertisements

Solution

Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect

Explanation:

Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect because the public did not have access to public information earlier.

shaalaa.com
Statement and Arguments (Entrance Exam)
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
2015-2016 (May) Set 1

RELATED QUESTIONS

For the following question, read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.

Instead of being concerned with what actually happens in practice ... [economics] is increasing) reoccupied with developing pseudo-mathematical formulas. These provide models of behavior that never quite fit what actually happens, in a way which resembles the physical sciences; one wrong: instead of equations describing reality, economics produces equations describing deal conditions and theoretical clarity of a type which never occurs in practice.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument of the passage above?


`The tribes should develop their own culture and make their contribution to the cultural richness of the country. It is unnecessary to cause them to change their customs, habits or diversions so far as to make themselves indistinguishable liom stimulating diversity'.

Which of the following is not an assumption required by the above argument?


Select the correct alternative from the given choices.
There are four executives A, B, C and D each working in a different organization amongst Microsoft, Oracle, Infosys, and IBM, not necessarily in the same order. Each of them gives three replies to any question asked, which are alternately true or false, in any order. When asked to mention the name of the executive and the organization that he works for, they gave the following replies:
A: C works with Microsoft.
D works with IBM.
B works with Infosys.

B: A works with IBM.
C works with Infosys.
D works with Oracle.

C: D works with Microsoft.
B works with Oracle.
A works with Infosys.

D: B is not working with Infosys.
A is working with IBM.
C is not working with Microsoft.

A definite arrangement can be obtained from the above information. Answer the questions based on the above data.
B works with


In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Should income tax be abolished?
Argument I: Yes, it is unnecessary burden on the wage earners.
Argument II: No, it is a good source of revenue.


In the following question, one statement is followed by two arguments (a) and (b) one supporting and the other against it.

Statement: Should the death sentence be abolished?

Arguments:
(a) Yes - The death sentence deprives the culprit of all chances of improving his behaviour.
(b) No - Capital punishment restrains criminal tendency.


In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.

Question: Should the system of reservation of posts for scheduled castes be introduced in private sector?

Argument I: Yes, this would give more opportunity of development to these groups.
Argument II: No, this would affect merit.


Identify the alternative which gives true picture of the relation between the arguments listed below:

1. A healthy society is characterized by the overall development of every section. As in the case of human body no organ is less prominent, so also in a society, no section is less important. If any human organ is sick, then the human being is sick. Similarly, if any section of society is sick, then the society is sick.

2. It is fallacious to think that priority to production of agricultural products alone promotes the prosperity of farmers. Prosperity has too many discussions. Transportation, communication, network, sound economic policy, to mention a few are equally important to the economic well-being of fanners. Hence they also deserve consideration.


The question consists of five statements (a-e) followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument; that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

a. All captains are great players.   
b. Some captains are successful sports administrators.   
c. Ritwik is a great player.   
d. Ritwik is a captain and successful sports administrator.   
e. Some successful sports administrators are great players.  
Choose the correct option. 


Rahul: One would have to be blind to the reality of moral obligation to deny that people who believe a course of action to be morally obligatory for them have both the right and the duty to pursue that action, and that no one else has any right to stop them from doing so.   
Richa: But imagine an artist who feels morally obliged to do whatever she can to prevent works of art from being destroyed confronting a morally committed antipornography demonstrator engaged in destroying artworks he deems pornographic. According to your principle, the artist has, simultaneously, both the right and duty to stop the destruction and no right whatsoever to stop it. 
Which of the following, if substituted for the scenario invoked by Richa, would preserve the force of her argument?


Unless they are used as strictly temporary measures, rent control ordinances (municipal regulations placing limits on rent increase) have several negative effects for renters. One of these is that the controls will bring about a shortage of rental units. This disadvantage for renters occurs over the long run, but the advantage-smaller rent increases - occurs immediately. In many municipalities, especially in all those where tenants of rent-control units have a secure hold on political power and can get rent-control ordinances enacted or repealed, it is invariably the desire for short-term gain that guides those tenants in the exercise of that power.   
If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred from them? 


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×