Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In the of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent causes without having any relationship.
Statement I: The Government, by legislation has decided to make all public information available to general public.
Statement II: Before passing legislation, general public did not have access to public information.
Options
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect
Both statements I and II are independent causes.
Statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.
Both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
Advertisements
Solution
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect
Explanation:
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect because the public did not have access to public information earlier.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
In this question, read the given argument or statement carefully, making any factual assumptions necessary. Then choose the best answer out of the four choices to the question asked. Note that not all the facts given will be relevant for determining the answer. `Senthil goes to Ambala for the first time in his life. On the way from the railway station to his hotel, he sees twelve people, all of them male. He concludes that there are no women in Ambala. As a matter of fact, there are many thousands of women in Ambala.' Which of the following best describes Senthil's error?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
A minimalist understanding of architectural elements and accents ensued in deeply contemplative as well as immaculate design frames that spoke about the enchantment of jute, yarn and cotton thread in the solo of Purvai Rai painting at Art Alive exhibition. Purvai’s compositions contained the power of devotion in design in the sequence of threading and arranging jute, yarn and cotton threads that had echoes of inner roots. The action of creating and expressing both have a ritualistic focus. “Design for me is born out of imagination and quiet discipline, I have always had an interest in the chakra,” she explains. “I feel the language of Indian design came from ancient design traditions. So I play with subtle abstraction continuously created around textile-related conversations. I explore colour, texture, pattern, and aspects of ‘textile language’, and keep an eye also on knotting. I use jute, yarn and cotton because it speaks of indigenous practices that go back into history.”
Which one of the following is not consistent with the artist’s composition of Purvai Rai?
In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Should mass media be fully controlled by the government?
Argument I: Yes, a variety of news only confuse people.
Argument II: No, controlled news loses credibility.
The question below contains a Statement and two Arguments I and II. Assume the statement to be true, choose the Argument which is strong using the Code below.
Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes. They are places where international criminals operate.
II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.
In the following question, one statement is followed by two arguments (a) and (b) one supporting and the other against it.
Statement: Should India adopt a Presidential system?
Arguments:
(a) Yes - Because our experience of Parliamentary democracy is disappointing.
(b) No - Because it will concentrate power in the hands of a few people.
In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.
Question: Should private operators be allowed to operate, passengers train service in India?
Argument I: No, private operators do not agree to operate on non-profitable sectors.
Argument II: Yes, it will improve the quality of Indian Railway Service.
In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.
Question: Should right to primary education be made as a fundamental right.
Argument I: We should first complete other development projects, education of children may wait.
Argument II: Yes, without primary education for all there cannot be inclusive development.
Identify the alternative which gives true picture of the relation between the arguments listed below:
1. A healthy society is characterized by the overall development of every section. As in the case of human body no organ is less prominent, so also in a society, no section is less important. If any human organ is sick, then the human being is sick. Similarly, if any section of society is sick, then the society is sick.
2. It is fallacious to think that priority to production of agricultural products alone promotes the prosperity of farmers. Prosperity has too many discussions. Transportation, communication, network, sound economic policy, to mention a few are equally important to the economic well-being of fanners. Hence they also deserve consideration.
Given below is some statement followed by two arguments. Read carefully and decide which of the arguments strongly support the statement.
Statement: Should the pay scale and conditions of service of government employees be made applicable to private sector employees?
Arguments:
(i) No, this will develop inertia, inefficiency and would adversely affect spirit of competition.
(ii) Yes, this will enhance dedication to work and institutional loyalty.
Rahul: One would have to be blind to the reality of moral obligation to deny that people who believe a course of action to be morally obligatory for them have both the right and the duty to pursue that action, and that no one else has any right to stop them from doing so.
Richa: But imagine an artist who feels morally obliged to do whatever she can to prevent works of art from being destroyed confronting a morally committed antipornography demonstrator engaged in destroying artworks he deems pornographic. According to your principle, the artist has, simultaneously, both the right and duty to stop the destruction and no right whatsoever to stop it.
Which of the following, if substituted for the scenario invoked by Richa, would preserve the force of her argument?
