Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In the of the questions, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent causes without having any relationship.
Statement I: The Government, by legislation has decided to make all public information available to general public.
Statement II: Before passing legislation, general public did not have access to public information.
पर्याय
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect
Both statements I and II are independent causes.
Statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.
Both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect
Explanation:
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect because the public did not have access to public information earlier.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Friendship was indeed a value for the villagers, more for men than for women. Two good friends were said to be 'like brothers' (literally, like elder brother-younger brother, annatammandirahage). I heard this expression several times and I could not help recalling the statement of an elderly English colleague who had told me that he and his brother were very close and had written to each other every week. He had added, We are very good friends. That is friends, connoted intimacy in England while in Rampura (as in rural India everywhere), brotherhood conveyed intimacy'.
Which of the following, if true, would directly contradict the conclusion of the above argument?
‘A language is most easily leant when it is in tune with the social context. To teach an Indian child in English at the primary stage ... strengthens distinctions of class and status and warps the mind. Failure to resort to regional languages in literacy campaigns also hampers their success'.
Which of the following claims, if true, would weaken the argument in the passage above?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
In a monarchy, the king or queen is the head of state. However, as the UK has a constitutional monarchy, the ability to make and pass legislation belongs to Parliament rather than the Queen. The monarch retains a symbolic role in government. She formally opens Parliament every year, and when the government passes a bill, it cannot become an Act of Parliament until it receives her stamp of approval, a process called Royal Assent. In reality, though, no monarch has refused to give Royal Assent since 1708, when Queen Anne did so only at the behest of ministers. As such, Queen Elizabeth II’s formal duties are largely representational, such as embarking on goodwill visits abroad and hosting foreign heads of state. The monarch’s main role is to serve as a vital part of Britain’s “national identity, unity, and pride”, says the official royal website, royal.uk.
Which of the following would contradict the author’s stance?
Select the correct alternative from the given choices.
There are four executives A, B, C and D each working in a different organization amongst Microsoft, Oracle, Infosys, and IBM, not necessarily in the same order. Each of them gives three replies to any question asked, which are alternately true or false, in any order. When asked to mention the name of the executive and the organization that he works for, they gave the following replies:
A: C works with Microsoft.
D works with IBM.
B works with Infosys.
B: A works with IBM.
C works with Infosys.
D works with Oracle.
C: D works with Microsoft.
B works with Oracle.
A works with Infosys.
D: B is not working with Infosys.
A is working with IBM.
C is not working with Microsoft.
A definite arrangement can be obtained from the above information. Answer the questions based on the above data.
B works with
In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Has the Medical Science really lengthened the span of life?
Argument I: Yes, the new drugs have been able to combat the diseases and increases the span of life.
Argument II: No, the eternal truth that every person's days are numbered cannot be denied.
In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Should there be women chief ministers in states?
Argument I: Yes, only then will the plight of women be removed and their conditions will improve.
Argument II: No: a woman is not capable of ruling a state.
Four arguments are given. Each is a set of three sentences. Decide which set has third sentence as logical conclusion of first and second sentences considering the first two to be correct.
I. All cats are babies. All babies are young. All cats are young.
II. Some nerds are fools. Some fools are green. Some nerds are green.
III. Cars are well-built. Well-built sustains. Cars sustain.
IV. All cyclists are fast. Some fast are wrestlers. Some cyclists are wrestlers.
In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.
Question: Should the system of reservation of posts for scheduled castes be introduced in private sector?
Argument I: Yes, this would give more opportunity of development to these groups.
Argument II: No, this would affect merit.
Identify the alternative which best explains the relation between the arguments mentioned below:
Arguments:
1. It is highly probable that every student of Law at University level would have done a course on principles of ethics and Rama being a student of law, in all probability, would have done a course on principles of ethics.
2. At University level, every faculty aims at a super specialty for which emphasis is laid upon structuring the curricula in such a way that every faculty is treated as a closed system so that no inter-disciplinary study is acceptable. Principles of ethics being essentially an integral part of philosophy most probably are out of any course on law.
Given below is some statement followed by two arguments. Read carefully and decide which of the arguments strongly support the statement.
Statement: Should the age of marriage be raised to 25 years for boys and 21 for girls?
Arguments:
(i) No, it is difficult to change a social practice in Indian conditions.
(ii) Yes, by that age people develop a sense of responsibility and also complete their education.
