Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:
In the question, two statements are numbered as I and II. There may be a cause and effect relationship between the two statements. The statements may be the effect of the same cause or an independent cause. The statements may be independent causes without having any relationship. Read both the statements and mark your answer as:
Statement I: In last two years, there is a considerable reduction in cancellation of flights due to fog in North India.
Statement II: In last two years, there is a considerable improvement in passenger amenities on all airports of North India.
पर्याय
Both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
Statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect.
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect.
Both statements I and II are independent causes.
Advertisements
उत्तर
Both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
Explanation:
According to the statements, there have been cancellations because of the fog while there has been considerable improvement in passenger amenities because of some unstated reasons. So, both statements I and II are effects of independent causes.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
‘A language is most easily leant when it is in tune with the social context. To teach an Indian child in English at the primary stage ... strengthens distinctions of class and status and warps the mind. Failure to resort to regional languages in literacy campaigns also hampers their success'.
Which of the following claims, if true, would weaken the argument in the passage above?
'Poverty is ... more restrictive and limiting than anything else. Its poverty and low standards continue then democracy, for all its fine institutions and ideals, ceases to be a liberating force. It must therefore aim continuously at the eradication of poverty and its companion unemployment. In other words, political democracy is not enough. It must develop into economic democracy also'.
Which of the following views, if true, would weaken the argument of the above passage?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
A minimalist understanding of architectural elements and accents ensued in deeply contemplative as well as immaculate design frames that spoke about the enchantment of jute, yarn and cotton thread in the solo of Purvai Rai painting at Art Alive exhibition. Purvai’s compositions contained the power of devotion in design in the sequence of threading and arranging jute, yarn and cotton threads that had echoes of inner roots. The action of creating and expressing both have a ritualistic focus. “Design for me is born out of imagination and quiet discipline, I have always had an interest in the chakra,” she explains. “I feel the language of Indian design came from ancient design traditions. So I play with subtle abstraction continuously created around textile-related conversations. I explore colour, texture, pattern, and aspects of ‘textile language’, and keep an eye also on knotting. I use jute, yarn and cotton because it speaks of indigenous practices that go back into history.”
Which one of the following is not consistent with the artist’s composition of Purvai Rai?
Choose the best option that correctly classifies the four sentences as a :
F: Fact: if it relates to a known matter of direct observation, or an existing reality or something known to be true
J: Judgment: If it is an opinion or estimate or anticipation of common sense or intention.
I: Inference: If it is a logical conclusion or deduction about something based on the knowledge of facts.
A. The Cabinet minister definitely took the wrong step in giving the government contract.
B. Under the circumstances, he had many other alternatives.
C. The Prime Minister is embarrassed due to the minister's decision.
D. If he has put the government in jeopardy, the minister must resign.
Select the correct alternative from the given choices.
There are four executives A, B, C and D each working in a different organization amongst Microsoft, Oracle, Infosys, and IBM, not necessarily in the same order. Each of them gives three replies to any question asked, which are alternately true or false, in any order. When asked to mention the name of the executive and the organization that he works for, they gave the following replies:
A: C works with Microsoft.
D works with IBM.
B works with Infosys.
B: A works with IBM.
C works with Infosys.
D works with Oracle.
C: D works with Microsoft.
B works with Oracle.
A works with Infosys.
D: B is not working with Infosys.
A is working with IBM.
C is not working with Microsoft.
A definite arrangement can be obtained from the above information. Answer the questions based on the above data.
Who among the following works with Microsoft?
Select the correct alternative from the given choices.
There are four executives A, B, C and D each working in a different organization amongst Microsoft, Oracle, Infosys, and IBM, not necessarily in the same order. Each of them gives three replies to any question asked, which are alternately true or false, in any order. When asked to mention the name of the executive and the organization that he works for, they gave the following replies:
A: C works with Microsoft.
D works with IBM.
B works with Infosys.
B: A works with IBM.
C works with Infosys.
D works with Oracle.
C: D works with Microsoft.
B works with Oracle.
A works with Infosys.
D: B is not working with Infosys.
A is working with IBM.
C is not working with Microsoft.
A definite arrangement can be obtained from the above information. Answer the questions based on the above data.
Which of the following statements must be false?
In the question a statement is given followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Mark the answer as:
Statement: Should there be women chief ministers in states?
Argument I: Yes, only then will the plight of women be removed and their conditions will improve.
Argument II: No: a woman is not capable of ruling a state.
Exploitation of poor by rich can be stemmed only if the state exercises complete control over agriculture and industrial production. But state control is beset by two evils; corruption and delay. The net result is that if man tries to escape from one evil, then he is trapped by another. Suffering, hence, is inescapable. The argument presented above seems to imply the following conclusions. Identify the one which is least dubious. Apply common sense.
In the following question, one statement is followed by two arguments (a) and (b) one supporting and the other against it.
Statement: Should the death sentence be abolished?
Arguments:
(a) Yes - The death sentence deprives the culprit of all chances of improving his behaviour.
(b) No - Capital punishment restrains criminal tendency.
In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.
Question: Should the system of reservation of posts for scheduled castes be introduced in private sector?
Argument I: Yes, this would give more opportunity of development to these groups.
Argument II: No, this would affect merit.
