Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Why did Mahatma Gandhi find in 'salt' a powerful symbol that could unite the nation? Explain.
Advertisements
Solution
Mahatma Gandhi knew that the only way that a strong opposition against the British is possible is only when India stands against the British unitedly. However, by then the British had already played their cards and created rift among the different sections of the society. The rich looked down upon the poor and the high caste placed themselves at a positive unreachable by the low caste. It was then the British imposed the exploitatve tax on salt. Gandhi saw this as an opportunity to unify the population. he knew that salt was one item that was used by the rich, poor and all sections. If he could raise a protest aginst this law, he could get the support of all. It was with this intention that he started the salt march.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Which organisation led the protest against water privatisation in Bolivia?
Explain the main features of this 'swaraj flag.'
Who dissolved the popularly elected parliament in February 2005, in Nepal?
Which one of the following statements is correct regarding 'sectional interest groups'?
Why did a major protest erupt in 1926 in the Saigon Native Girls School in Vietnam? Explain.
How are popular struggles integral to the working democracy? Explain with an example of Bolivia's struggle against privatisation of water.
Match List I (organisations and struggles) with List II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:
|
List I |
List II |
||
|
1. |
Organisations that seek to promote the interests of a particular section or group |
Α. |
Movement |
|
2. |
Organisations that seek to promote common interest |
Β. |
Political parties |
|
3. |
Struggles launched for the resolution of a social problem with or without an organisational structure |
C. |
Sectional interest groups |
|
4. |
Organisations that mobilise people with a view to win political power |
D. |
Public interest groups |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
(a) |
C |
D |
B |
A |
|
(b) |
C |
D |
A |
B |
|
(c) |
D |
C |
B |
A |
|
(d) |
B |
C |
D |
A |
Mewat is one of the most backward areas in Haryana. It used to be a part of two districts, Gurgaon and Faridabad. The people of Mewat felt that the area will get better attention if it were to become a separate district. But political parties were indifferent to this sentiment. The demand for a separate district was raised by Mewat Educational and Social Organisation and Mewat Saksharta Samiti in 1996. Later, Mewat Vikas Sabha was founded in 2000 and carried out a series of public awareness campaigns. This forced both the major parties, Congress and the Indian National Lok Dal, to announce their support for the new district before the assembly elections held in February 2005. The new district came into existence in July 2005.
In this example what is the relationship that you observe among movement, political parties and the government? Can you think of an example that shows a relationship different from this one?
"Multi-purpose projects and large dams have been the cause of many new social movements." Highlight the concerns related to such movements.
How do pressure groups and movements strengthen democracy? Explain.
