Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Question consists of five statements followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a sped fie order Choose the best option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment.
B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to wealth.
C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.
D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increase carbon monoxide.
E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
Options
CBA
BDE
CDE
BAC
Advertisements
Solution
CBA
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
For the following question, read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.
Instead of being concerned with what actually happens in practice ... [economics] is increasing) reoccupied with developing pseudo-mathematical formulas. These provide models of behavior that never quite fit what actually happens, in a way which resembles the physical sciences; one wrong: instead of equations describing reality, economics produces equations describing deal conditions and theoretical clarity of a type which never occurs in practice.
Which of the following best summaries the argument of this paragraph?
For the following question, read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.
`Religions, like camel caravans, seem to avoid mountain passes. Buddhism spread quickly south from Buddha's birth-place in southern Nepal across the flat Gangetic plain to Sri Lanka. But it took a millennium to reach China ... The religious belt stretched eventually to Mongolia and Japan, but in Afghanistan, Buddhism filled only a narrow belt that left pagans among the valleys to the east and west in Kailash and Ghor'.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion to the above argument?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
Since the book’s first publication in 1978, “Orientalism” has become one of those words that shuts down conversation on liberal campuses, where no one wants to be accused of being “Orientalist” any more than they want to be called racist, sexist, homophobic, or transphobic. That “Orientalist” is now a commonly applied epithet is a tribute to the power of Said’s account, but also to its vulgarization. With Orientalism, Said wanted to open a discussion about the way the Arab-Islamic world had been imagined by the West—not to prevent a clear-eyed reckoning with the region’s problems, of which he was all too painfully aware. He was also acutely aware of writing a work of history that was destined, like all such works, to become itself a historical document, refracting the pressures and anxieties of its moment.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
Direction : Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:
In a monarchy, the king or queen is the head of state. However, as the UK has a constitutional monarchy, the ability to make and pass legislation belongs to Parliament rather than the Queen. The monarch retains a symbolic role in government. She formally opens Parliament every year, and when the government passes a bill, it cannot become an Act of Parliament until it receives her stamp of approval, a process called Royal Assent. In reality, though, no monarch has refused to give Royal Assent since 1708, when Queen Anne did so only at the behest of ministers. As such, Queen Elizabeth II’s formal duties are largely representational, such as embarking on goodwill visits abroad and hosting foreign heads of state. The monarch’s main role is to serve as a vital part of Britain’s “national identity, unity, and pride”, says the official royal website, royal.uk.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
Select the correct alternative from the given choices.
There are four executives A, B, C and D each working in a different organization amongst Microsoft, Oracle, Infosys, and IBM, not necessarily in the same order. Each of them gives three replies to any question asked, which are alternately true or false, in any order. When asked to mention the name of the executive and the organization that he works for, they gave the following replies:
A: C works with Microsoft.
D works with IBM.
B works with Infosys.
B: A works with IBM.
C works with Infosys.
D works with Oracle.
C: D works with Microsoft.
B works with Oracle.
A works with Infosys.
D: B is not working with Infosys.
A is working with IBM.
C is not working with Microsoft.
A definite arrangement can be obtained from the above information. Answer the questions based on the above data.
B works with
Read the information given and answer the question that follows.
Identify the statement which cannot be accepted.
In the following question, one statement is followed by two arguments (a) and (b) one supporting and the other against it.
Statement: Should India adopt a Presidential system?
Arguments:
(a) Yes - Because our experience of Parliamentary democracy is disappointing.
(b) No - Because it will concentrate power in the hands of a few people.
In this question and two arguments are given. Arguments in relation to the question are either weak or strong, use this key to give your responses.
Question: Should right to primary education be made as a fundamental right.
Argument I: We should first complete other development projects, education of children may wait.
Argument II: Yes, without primary education for all there cannot be inclusive development.
Given below is some statement followed by two arguments. Read carefully and decide which of the arguments strongly support the statement.
Statement: Should the pay scale and conditions of service of government employees be made applicable to private sector employees?
Arguments:
(i) No, this will develop inertia, inefficiency and would adversely affect spirit of competition.
(ii) Yes, this will enhance dedication to work and institutional loyalty.
A government's proposed 8 percent cut in all subsidies to art groups will be difficult for those groups to absorb. As can be seen, however, from their response to last year's cut, it will not put them out of existence. Last year there was also an 8 percent cut, and though private fund-raising was very difficult for the art groups in the current recessionary economy, they did survive.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because of the argument
