Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two.
Statements:
1. All human beings need education.
2. All teachers need training.
3. Education is provided by the teachers.
4. X is a teacher.
5. X needs training.
6. Students are future of a nation.
The set of statements is:
Options
1, 2, 5
2, 3, 4
2, 4, 5
4, 5, 6
Advertisements
Solution
2, 4, 5
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Find the odd one out :
Symphony, Orchestra, Guitar, Mob
All men are chairs. John Doe is a man. In logical language, therefore:
Read the following information for a question and chose the most appropriate option:
P and Q are good at driving the Motorcycle and Jeep. R and P are good at driving Jeep and Lorry. R, S, and T are good at driving Motor Cycle and Lorry. T and R are good at driving buses and Tempo. S and Q are good at driving Bus and Jeep.
Who is good at a driving motorcycle, jeep, and Lorry but not a bus?
Find the odd-man-out:
Choose the most appropriate option:
If Oceans are Deserts, then Waves are:
Rahul Dravid, the head coach of India’s Under-19 cricket team, explained that the 2018 Under-19 World Cup team selection strategy was about providing opportunities to a lot more players to come into the India Under-19 fold. He explained that more than winning — which is not the right touchstone of success of a program at this level — what matters is how many of the players are able to move to the next level, which is playing first-class cricket. He, therefore, made a conscious decision to not select players from the previous World Cup to the 2018 Under-19 World Cup squad.
Which of the following is the most desirable outcome of Dravid’s selection strategy from his perspective?
Flow : River :: Stagnant : ?
The question has a main statement followed by four statements labelled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
Every player will become a champ.
A. Rajesh is a player.
B. Rajesh will become champ.
C. Rajesh is not a player.
D. Rajesh will not become a champ.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Water has a shape, has volume.
- The knowledge is like water, flowing from one side to another.
Conclusions
- Knowledge is interdisciplinary.
- The knowledge is bound within a specific area.
- Knowledge influences the core of mental activity directly.
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should there be a total ban on the use of plastic bags?
Arguments
- No. instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.
- Yes, the use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and waterlogging, and hence, it is necessary to ban it.
