मराठी

Instructions for Question: Choose the Set of Three Statements Where the Third Statement Can Be Logically Derived from the Preceding Two

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Instructions for Question: Choose the set of three statements where the third statement can be logically derived from the preceding two. 

Statements:

1. All human beings need education.
2. All teachers need training.
3. Education is provided by the teachers.
4. X is a teacher.
5. X needs training.
6. Students are future of a nation.

The set of statements is:

पर्याय

  • 1, 2, 5 

  • 2, 3, 4 

  • 2, 4, 5 

  • 4, 5, 6 

MCQ
Advertisements

उत्तर

2, 4, 5 

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

If 1 × 7 = 8, 2 × 7 = 16, 3 × 7 = 24, 4 × 7 = 32, then what is value of  9 × 7? 


Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will the examination result be poor.   

1. The examination result is poor.
2. The teaching standard is not destroyed.
3. Examination result is not poor.
4. The teaching standard is destroyed.

The ordered pair of statements is: 


Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: The computer will not work if the operating system fails.

1. Operating system fails.
2. The operating system does not fail.
3. The computer does not work.
4. The computer works.

The ordered pair of statements is: 


Recently, the answers to a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind and nine other people A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Hand I in this matter. interrogating them, the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer-key. AU the others create their answer-key from one or two people who already possess the same. These people are called his/her "'sources". If the person has two sources. then he/she compares the answer-keys obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from both sources is identical, it is copied, otherwise, it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source's answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key. 
The paper contained 200 questions; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more of them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers.

Name Wrong Answer(s) Blank Answer(s)
A 45 ___
B 96 46, 90, 25
C 27, 56 17, 46, 90
D 17 ____
E 46, 90 ____
F 14, 46 92, 90
G 25 ____
H 46, 92 ____
I 27 17, 26, 90

Which of the following statements is true?


Choose the most appropriate option:

If it is false that 'Animals are seldom aggressive', then which one of the following statements conveys the same meaning?


Architect : Building :: Sculptor : ?


Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.
Seven film buffs -Aamna, Archana, Aradhana, Anu, Aahana, Anuja, and Aashna - attend a showing of classic movies. Three films are shown, one directed by Satyajit Ray, one by Stanley Kubrick, and one by Steven Spielberg. Each of the film buff see only one of the three films. The films are shown only once, one film at a time.
The following restrictions must apply:

  1. Exactly twice as many of the film buffs see the Stanley Kubrick film as the Satyajit Ray film.
  2. Aamna and Aahana do not see the same film as each other.
  3. Archana and Anu do not see the same film as each other.
  4. Anuja and Aashna see the same film as each other.
  5. Aradhana sees the Stanley Kubrick film.
  6. Aamna sees either the Satyajit Ray film or the Steven Spielberg film.

Each of the following must be false EXCEPT


In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should English be the medium of instruction for higher education in India?

Arguments

  1. Yes, even in advanced countries like the UK and the USA, the medium of instruction is English for higher education.
  2. Yes, English is a much widely spoken language in the world today.

A growing number of ecologists have begun to recommend lifting the ban on the hunting of leopards, which are not an endangered species, and on the international trade of leopard's skin. Why, then, do I continue to support the protection of leopards?
For the same reason, I oppose the hunting of people. Admittedly, there are far too many human beings on this planet to qualify us for inclusion on the list of endangered species. Still, I doubt the same ecologists endorsing the resumption of leopard hunting would use that fact to recommend the hunting of human beings.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?


In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.

Statement

  • Should there be a total ban on the use of plastic bags? 

Arguments

  1. No. instead the thickness of plastic bags, which can be used without much damage to the environment, should be specified.
  2. Yes, the use of plastic bags causes various problems like water pollution and waterlogging, and hence, it is necessary to ban it.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×